Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Rtfm Testing Utility

ASecurity

A documentation quality methodology that spawns fresh agents to validate whether docs are actually usable.

19 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 9/19/2026
ai-agentsgotestingdocumentation

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/19/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add rondoflow/rondoflow --skill rtfm-testing-utility --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Rtfm Testing Utility?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Rtfm Testing Utility
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/rondoflow-rtfm-testing-utility/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/rondoflow-rtfm-testing-utility)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: rtfm-testing-utility
description: "A documentation quality methodology that spawns fresh agents to validate whether docs are actually usable."
category: "AI & Agents"
author: community
version: "1.0.0"
icon: bot
---

# RTFM Testing

A documentation quality methodology that spawns fresh agents to validate whether docs are actually usable.

## The Problem

Documentation written by the person who built the thing is almost always incomplete. They fill in gaps unconsciously. They assume context. They skip "obvious" steps.

RTFM Testing fixes this by spawning a fresh agent with zero context and asking: can you complete this task using only the docs?

## When to Use

- Before publishing docs, READMEs, tutorials, or setup guides
- When users report confusion but you can't see why
- After major refactors to validate docs still work
- As part of CI for documentation-heavy projects

## How It Works

1. **Identify the task** — What should someone be able to do after reading the docs?
2. **Bundle the docs** — Collect all relevant documentation (and nothing else)
3. **Spawn a fresh tester** — Use the TESTER.md prompt with `sessions_spawn`
4. **Analyze failures** — Every confusion point is a doc bug
5. **Fix and repeat** — Update docs, respawn, retest until clean

## Usage

```
sessions_spawn(
  task: "Complete the following task using ONLY the provided documentation. [TASK DESCRIPTION]\n\n---\n\n[PASTE DOCS HERE]",
  agentId: "default",
  label: "rtfm-test"
)
```

Or use the full TESTER.md prompt for more structured output.

## Metrics

- **Cold Start Score** — Number of spawn cycles until task completion (lower = better docs)
- **Gap Count** — Number of `[GAP]` reports per run
- **Gap Categories** — Missing steps, unclear language, wrong assumptions, missing prerequisites

## Key Principles

1. **No hints** — Don't help the tester. Let it fail.
2. **Literal reading** — Tester must not infer or guess
3. **Docs only** — No external knowledge, no "common sense"
4. **Failures are signal** — Every stumble is actionable feedback

## Files

- `SKILL.md` — This file
- `TESTER.md` — System prompt for the fresh agent
- `GAPS.md` — Output format specification

Attribution

rondoflowrondoflow
View sourceMore from rondoflow →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

693621 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →