Skip to content
Back to skills

Mining

ASecurity

Mine, compare, or re-crawl approved external robotics repositories into local evidence-cited Robium observations for later skill absorption.

  • 34 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 5 views
  • Added September 19, 2026
ai-agentsgitdocumentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 3 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 24, 2026

npx -y skills add robium-ai/robium --skill mining --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Mining?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Mining
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/robium-ai-mining/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/robium-ai-mining)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: mining
description: Mine, compare, or re-crawl approved external robotics repositories into local evidence-cited Robium observations for later skill absorption.
---

# Mining

Mine for transferable decisions, not code volume.

## Choose what is worth reading

- Candidate discovery and a one-line registry entry are read-only triage.
  Survey or deep-read only a repository the user named or approved in
  `learnings/SOURCES.md`.
- Start with a survey of the tree, active code paths, documentation, examples,
  tests, and license. Spend deep-reading effort only where the survey finds a
  decision that could change a Robium skill.
- Prefer official/vendor sources. Use comparative reads when independent
  projects answer the same question; use a re-crawl when a previously mined
  source changed.
- Read [WORKFLOW.md](WORKFLOW.md) for the survey, deep-read, comparative, and
  re-crawl mechanics.

## Keep only reusable evidence

- Keep patterns, orderings, failure discriminators, integration shapes, and
  configuration decisions that transfer beyond the source project.
- Drop project names, incidental ports, arbitrary tuning, style, and other
  local choices unless they explain a reusable boundary.
- Every observation cites a pinned repository commit, path, line range, and a
  verbatim source excerpt that the citation verifier can find.
- Read [EVIDENCE.md](EVIDENCE.md) for source-authority thresholds, conflicts,
  licensing, placement, and new-skill proposals.

## Preserve the learning boundary

- Output gitignored local observations and source-registry updates, never
  direct skill edits. Absorption belongs to `learning-loop` and remains
  separately reviewed.
- Compare findings with existing skills and observations. Record disagreement
  with both provenances; do not silently replace Robium field evidence with an
  upstream idiom.
- Point to source code by default. Vendor code only when it is short, genuinely
  useful as a maintained example, and its license and attribution permit it.
- Do not crawl issue trackers or commit history as part of the current mining
  workflow.

## Done

- The registry records the pinned commit, crawl date, status, and the skill or
  reference files that ultimately retained the finding. Local observation IDs
  are not repository history.
- Citation and observation checks pass for every retained finding.
- Each finding names the owning skill or explains why no current skill owns it.
- Temporary clones and survey reports remain outside the committed plugin.
- End with a short handoff: report how many local observations were saved and
  how many are `ready` versus `tentative`, then say that the next step is to
  run `learning-loop` to distill ready findings into existing skills or route
  a justified new-skill proposal through `skill-author`. Ask whether the user
  wants that absorption run in a background subagent; do not start it without
  approval.

Files in this skill

  • EVIDENCE.md2.5 KB
  • SKILL.md2.3 KB
  • WORKFLOW.md2.7 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.