[omh] Agent Debug workflow: capture a stuck, looping, drifting, or repeatedly failing agent run, diagnose the likely failure pattern, and prepare the smallest safe recovery action. Use when the user says: agent-debug, agent debug, agent debugging, agent introspection, agent self-debug, self-debug, self debugging, looping agent.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill omh-agent-debug --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Omh Agent Debug?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/rlaope-omh-agent-debug)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: "omh-agent-debug"
description: "[omh] Agent Debug workflow: capture a stuck, looping, drifting, or repeatedly failing agent run, diagnose the likely failure pattern, and prepare the smallest safe recovery action. Use when the user says: agent-debug, agent debug, agent debugging, agent introspection, agent self-debug, self-debug, self debugging, looping agent."
metadata:
hermes:
tags: [workflow, oh-my-hermes, operations]
category: operations
phase: agent-debug
role: operator
quality_tier: workflow-surface-gated
---
# Agent Debug
This is a Hermes-native `agent-debug` workflow skill.
## Why This Exists
`agent-debug` exists so Hermes users can ask for this workflow in chat and receive a structured, evidence-bounded OMH operating surface instead of ad hoc narration.
## Do Not Use When
- The request is already handled by a narrower explicit skill with stronger evidence.
- The user asks OMH to secretly run external platforms, connectors, schedulers, file exports, or runtime agents.
- The only safe answer is to ask for missing authority, credentials, target, or observed evidence first.
## Examples
Good example:
- Prompt: agent-debug capture why this agent is looping on the same tool and prepare the smallest safe recovery action.
- Expected behavior: Produce `prepare_agent_debug` with required context, wrapper actions, and not-evidence boundaries.
- Why: The prompt names a real workflow surface that Hermes can orchestrate without hiding execution.
Bad example:
- Prompt: agent-debug silently reset the executor, patch the environment, and claim the future loop is fixed.
- Expected behavior: Report the missing observed evidence or authority instead of claiming the external step happened.
- Why: Prepared OMH guidance is not platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.
## Completion Checklist
- Failure state, intended goal, recent tool sequence, and context pressure are captured.
- Diagnosis distinguishes repeated command/tool loops, context drift, environment mismatch, service errors, and wrong-hypothesis tests.
- Recovery action is contained, reversible, and does not claim implementation, verification, CI, merge, or future-loop fixes.
## Recovery Notes
- If the request is install/setup health, route to doctor.
- If the request is a manager status or throughput review, route to agent-ops-review.
- If the request is a durable self-improvement record after diagnosis, route to workflow-learning.
## Workflow Lane
- Current lane: **Automation and status** (`achievements`, `workspace-audit`, `production-audit`, `automation-blueprint`, `github-event-ops`, `buzz`, `agent-board`, `gateway-intent-card`, `+34 more`) - schedules, status, health, and ops review.
- If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to `oh-my-hermes` or name the adjacent workflow.
- Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`.
## Use When
Use when an agent run is stuck, looping on tools, burning tokens without progress, drifting from the objective, losing context, or failing on recoverable environment/tool assumptions.
Strong routing signals: `agent-debug`, `agent debug`, `agent debugging`, `agent introspection`, `agent self-debug`, `self-debug`, `self debugging`, `looping agent`, `agent loop failure`, `agent run stuck`, `agent failure capture`, `tool retry loop`, `repeated tool calls`, `context drift`, `prompt drift`, `token burn`, `에이전트 디버그`, `에이전트 실패`, `에이전트 반복 실패`, `반복 실패`, `도구 반복`, `컨텍스트 드리프트`, `토큰 낭비`
## Catalog Metadata
Category: `operations`
Phase: `agent-debug`
Hermes role: `operator`
Quality tier: `workflow-surface-gated`
Reasoning demand: `light`
Quality bar:
- Name the user-facing workflow objective, required context, next action, and stop condition.
- Separate prepared guidance from observed platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.
- Expose missing tools, credentials, targets, or observations as user-visible gaps.
- Hold at least two competing failure hypotheses at once, each with observed evidence for and against; a diagnosis that never named a rival hypothesis is a guess.
- Order probes cheapest-discriminating-first: run the cheapest check that splits the surviving hypotheses before any expensive capture, rerun, or restart.
- When a run that used to work now fails, bisect from last-known-good to first-bad change (prompt, config, tool, model, or environment) instead of debugging the newest symptom.
- Name a cause only after revert-verify: remove the suspect change and observe the failure disappear, or state that causation is unproven.
- Reproduce the failure before preparing any recovery action; a fix without a reproduced failure first is a guess.
Handoff policy:
Keep this as Hermes-facing orchestration guidance first. Prepare executor, connector, gateway, or host-runtime handoff only when the user accepts that next step and observed evidence can be recorded.
Required inputs:
- user request
- target context
- delivery or status expectation
- known missing evidence
Expected outputs:
- agent_debug_report/v1
- agent_failure_capture/v1
- agent_failure_pattern_hypothesis/v1
- contained_recovery_action/v1
Artifact expectations:
- agent_debug_report/v1 with failure pattern, recent tool sequence, goal/context pressure, environment assumptions, recovery action, and evidence status
- agent_failure_capture/v1 separating observed errors and tool loops from inferred root-cause hypotheses
- contained_recovery_action/v1 with the smallest safe next action and explicit escalation boundary
Safety rules:
- An agent debug report is not executor reset, hidden state mutation, tool repair, implementation, verification, CI, merge-readiness, merge, or proof that future loops are fixed. Record only observed failure evidence, diagnosis hypotheses, contained recovery actions, and remaining blockers.
- Do not claim connector, gateway, runtime, file generation, memory mutation, or host automation evidence from prepared guidance.
## Runtime Evidence
Preferred harness for this skill: `agent-debug`.
```sh
omh runtime record --skill agent-debug --harness agent-debug --status started
```
Record observed delegation results; otherwise return `not_available` or `not_observed`.
Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.
- Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes.
Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion.
Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.
Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`. Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!