Treat upstream validators as authoritative. Align local config to them. Use when validation fails unexpectedly, before modifying validator behavior, or when tempted to change upstream tool code.
Scanned 5/27/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install rjmurillo/ai-agents---
name: validation-authority
description: Treat upstream validators as authoritative. Align local config to them. Use when validation fails unexpectedly, before modifying validator behavior, or when tempted to change upstream tool code.
license: MIT
metadata:
version: 1.0.0
source: Session 366 retrospective
id: Validation-Authority-001
---
# Validation Authority
When integrating external validators (PSScriptAnalyzer, markdownlint, ESLint, etc.), respect upstream defaults. Modify local configuration to match upstream behavior. Do not modify upstream tool code.
## Triggers
Activate when:
- Validation fails unexpectedly
- Before modifying validator behavior or configuration
- When tempted to change upstream tool source code
- When adding a new external validator to the project
- When suppressing validator warnings without rationale
## Decision Tree
```
Validation failure occurred
|
v
Is the validator upstream (external tool)?
| |
YES NO (local/custom)
| |
v v
Modify LOCAL config Modify tool as needed
to align with tool (you own the code)
|
v
Document override rationale
in config comments
```
## Process
1. **Classify the validator**: Determine if the tool is upstream (external) or local (project-owned).
2. **Identify the conflict**: Find the specific rule or default causing the failure.
3. **Check upstream defaults**: Read the tool's documentation for the default behavior.
4. **Align local config**: Update project configuration files to match or explicitly override upstream defaults.
5. **Document overrides**: Add comments explaining why any override differs from the upstream default.
## Trigger Table
| Scenario | Action | Example |
|----------|--------|---------|
| PSScriptAnalyzer rule fails | Update `.psscriptanalyzerrc.psd1` | Suppress `PSAvoidUsingWriteHost` with rationale |
| markdownlint rule fails | Update `.markdownlint.yaml` | Disable `MD013` line-length for generated docs |
| ESLint rule conflicts | Update `.eslintrc` | Override `no-console` for CLI tools |
| Upstream tool has a bug | File issue upstream, add workaround in config | Pin tool version, suppress specific rule |
| Tool default changed after upgrade | Review and align local config to new default | Update config after major version bump |
## Anti-Patterns
| Avoid | Why | Instead |
|-------|-----|---------|
| Forking upstream tools to change behavior | Creates maintenance burden, diverges from community | Configure locally, file upstream issues |
| Patching tool source to suppress warnings | Hides real issues, breaks on updates | Use tool's suppression mechanism |
| Disabling entire rule categories | Loses protection the rules provide | Suppress specific rules with rationale |
| Suppressing without rationale | Future maintainers cannot evaluate the override | Always document why in config comments |
| Copying tool defaults into local config | Config drift when upstream updates | Only override what you need to change |
## Verification
After applying this skill:
- [ ] Validator is classified as upstream or local
- [ ] Local config aligns with upstream defaults
- [ ] Any overrides include documented rationale
- [ ] No upstream tool source code was modified
- [ ] Validation passes with the updated config
## Examples
### Example 1: PSScriptAnalyzer Rule Failure
**Problem**: `PSAvoidUsingWriteHost` fails on a CLI script that intentionally uses `Write-Host`.
**Wrong approach**: Modify PSScriptAnalyzer source or remove the rule globally.
**Correct approach**:
```powershell
# .psscriptanalyzerrc.psd1
# Rationale: CLI scripts use Write-Host for user-facing output
@{
Rules = @{
PSAvoidUsingWriteHost = @{
Enable = $false
}
}
}
```
### Example 2: markdownlint Conflict
**Problem**: `MD013` (line length) fails on auto-generated documentation.
**Wrong approach**: Fork markdownlint to increase default line length.
**Correct approach**:
```yaml
# .markdownlint.yaml
# Rationale: Generated docs have long lines from tool output
MD013:
line_length: 200
tables: false
```
### Example 3: New Tool Integration
**Problem**: Adding `ruff` to a Python project. Several existing files fail.
**Wrong approach**: Disable all failing rules immediately.
**Correct approach**:
1. Run `ruff check` with defaults to see all violations.
2. Fix violations that align with project standards.
3. Suppress remaining rules per-file with `# noqa` and rationale.
4. Document any project-wide overrides in `pyproject.toml`.
## Related Skills
| Skill | Relationship |
|-------|--------------|
| [style-enforcement](../style-enforcement/SKILL.md) | Enforces style rules that this skill governs |
| [code-qualities-assessment](../code-qualities-assessment/SKILL.md) | Quality assessment, not validator config |
| [incoherence](../incoherence/SKILL.md) | Detects contradictions between config and behavior |
## Timelessness: 9/10
External tool integration is a universal software engineering concern. The principle of respecting upstream authority applies to any validator, linter, or static analysis tool regardless of language or framework.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!