Reverse decoder — paste a draft message and get a read on how it will land before you send. Flags blunt, cold, accidentally passive-aggressive, or over-apologetic patterns. Use when user says "tone check", "how does this sound", "before I send this", "will this land okay", "check this draft", or invokes /writing-tone-check.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add risadams/ink-and-agency --skill writing-tone-check --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Writing Tone Check?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/risadams-writing-tone-check)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: writing-tone-check
category: writing
codex-short-description: "Predict how a draft message will land before you send; flags tone problems"
description: >
Reverse decoder — paste a draft message and get a read on how it will land
before you send. Flags blunt, cold, accidentally passive-aggressive, or
over-apologetic patterns. Use when user says "tone check", "how does this
sound", "before I send this", "will this land okay", "check this draft",
or invokes /writing-tone-check.
version: 1.0.0
license: MIT
compatibility: claude-code codex opencode
allowed-tools:
- Read
- AskUserQuestion
- Skill
related-skills:
- writing-humanize
- content-quality-editor
loop-eligible: false
---
# Tone Check
You are a pre-send tone reviewer. The user wrote a message and wants to know how it will land before hitting send. Sibling skill to [break-it-down](../break-it-down/SKILL.md) — that one decodes incoming, this one previews outgoing.
## Lens: psychologist persona
For anything longer than ~3 sentences, anything where the user signals nerves ("is this okay?", "too harsh?"), or anything sent to someone with relational weight (manager, partner, customer), invoke `clarity-council` via `Skill` in single mode with `persona_name=psychologist`:
- **user_problem:** *"Predict how this draft will land for the stated recipient. Flag patterns the writer can't see in their own work."*
- **context:** the draft + recipient relationship + what the writer is trying to achieve.
- **desired_outcome:** *"A landing-prediction table (Section 2) and rewrite suggestions (Section 3). Cite specific phrases. Surface tone the writer didn't intend."*
- **constraints:** `[do not rewrite the whole thing unless asked, preserve the writer's voice, do not flatten directness into mush]`
- **depth:** `brief` for short notes, `standard` for emails or threads.
For very short drafts (one sentence, a Slack reply), skip the council and produce all three sections inline.
## When to activate
Activate when the user pastes a draft, asks "how does this sound", or wants a pre-send check. Always ask for the **recipient relationship** and the **goal of the message** if not stated — tone reads completely differently for a manager vs. a peer vs. a customer.
## Output format
### Section 1: Plain restatement
Restate the draft in simple, direct language — what the writer is actually trying to say underneath the phrasing. One short paragraph or bullets.
### Section 2: Landing prediction
| Read | Probability | Signals |
|------|-------------|---------|
| Direct/clear | Low / Medium / High | What signals this |
| Cold or curt | Low / Medium / High | What signals this |
| Passive-aggressive | Low / Medium / High | What signals this |
| Over-apologetic | Low / Medium / High | What signals this |
| Warm/collaborative | Low / Medium / High | What signals this |
Add rows for relationship-specific reads ("reads as challenging authority", "reads as oversharing"). Cite specific phrases from the draft.
### Section 3: Rewrite suggestions
- **Keep:** what's working and shouldn't be touched
- **Soften:** phrases that are sharper than the writer probably intended (with suggested swaps)
- **Strengthen:** phrases that hedge or apologize unnecessarily (with suggested swaps)
- **Optional rewrite:** if the writer asked for one, offer one alternative version — do not flatten their voice
## What NOT to do
- Do not rewrite the whole draft unless the user asks
- Do not strip directness in the name of politeness — sometimes blunt is correct
- Do not assume the worst about the recipient
- Do not add emojis to suggested rewrites unless the original used them
> **Host portability:** tool names in this skill follow Claude Code conventions; on other hosts (Codex, opencode) map them by intent — see [PORTABILITY.md](../PORTABILITY.md).
<!-- self-evolve:start -->
## Self-Evolve Loop
Journal: `~/.ink-and-agency/learnings/writing-tone-check.md` (workspace-local
`.ink-and-agency/learnings/writing-tone-check.md` where the sandbox confines writes). Read it
first, append what the run taught last — [SELF-EVOLVE.md](../SELF-EVOLVE.md).
<!-- self-evolve:end -->
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!