Quick reference for code-review-graph (CRG) MCP tools. Use when you need to look up a CRG tool name, parameter, or pattern. For workflow guidance, see AGENTS.md decision checkpoints. Requires `aios internal codemap install`.
Scanned 9/22/2026
npx -y skills add rexleimo/aios --skill aios-codemap-ops --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Aios Codemap Ops?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/rexleimo-aios-codemap-ops)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: aios-codemap-ops
description: >
Quick reference for code-review-graph (CRG) MCP tools. Use when you need
to look up a CRG tool name, parameter, or pattern. For workflow guidance,
see AGENTS.md decision checkpoints. Requires `aios internal codemap install`.
installCatalogName: aios-codemap-ops
clients: [codex, claude, gemini, opencode, hermes, workbuddy, pi, zcode, qoder]
scopes: [global, project]
defaultInstall:
global: true
project: false
tags: [aios, codemap, code-review, crg, reference]
repoTargets: [codex, claude, gemini, opencode, hermes, workbuddy, pi, zcode, qoder]
---
## CRG Tool Quick Reference
## Install/Doctor Targets
`aios internal codemap install --client all` should make CRG available to the AIOS-supported clients:
| Client | Config written |
|--------|----------------|
| Codex | `~/.codex/config.toml` (`[mcp_servers.code-review-graph]`) |
| Claude Code | `<project>/.mcp.json` |
| Gemini CLI | `<project>/.gemini/settings.json` |
| OpenCode | `~/.config/opencode/opencode.json` plus `plugins/crg-plugin.ts` |
If a client cannot see CRG tools, run `aios internal codemap doctor --fix --client <client>` from the target project, then restart that client.
## Structured-plan context candidates
When you know a structured-plan task's implementation target, do not ask a human to hand-author every supporting context reference.
1. Call AIOS MCP `aios_plan_task` with `action: "propose_context"`, the active `task_id`, and workspace-relative `targets` when the task has no targets yet.
2. AIOS derives a durable proposal from the target plus CRG callers, callees/imports, and tests. This proposal is reviewable only; it does not alter `.aios/planning/active.json`.
3. Present the refs and reasons to the human. Ask a human to activate all candidates with `aios plan task <id> --confirm-context-candidates`, or select a subset by repeating `--candidate-ref <ref>`; this is an explicit process step, not an identity/authentication boundary.
4. Only after confirmation may you say that the task has active execution context or invoke context-dependent orchestration.
### query_graph patterns
| Pattern | Returns |
|---------|---------|
| `callers_of` | Functions that call the target |
| `callees_of` | Functions called by the target |
| `imports_of` | Imports from a file/module |
| `importers_of` | Files that import a file/module |
| `children_of` | Nodes contained in a file/class |
| `tests_for` | Tests covering the target |
| `inheritors_of` | Classes inheriting from target |
| `file_summary` | All nodes in a file |
### refactor_tool modes
| Mode | Action |
|------|--------|
| `rename` | Preview rename across all locations |
| `dead_code` | Find unreferenced symbols |
| `suggest` | Community-driven refactoring suggestions |
### Confidence tiers
| Tier | Meaning |
|------|---------|
| `EXTRACTED` | Certain — directly parsed from code |
| `INFERRED` | Likely — deduced from patterns |
| `AMBIGUOUS` | Guess — low confidence |
### detail_level
- **minimal** (default): summary + counts + key entity names
- **standard**: full output with node/edge details
Always start with `minimal`. Escalate to `standard` only when insufficient.
### Key tool parameters
| Tool | Key params |
|------|-----------|
| `get_minimal_context` | `task` (required) |
| `detect_changes` | `base`, `detail_level`, `changed_files` |
| `get_impact_radius` | `changed_files`, `max_depth`, `detail_level` |
| `get_review_context` | `base`, `detail_level`, `include_source` |
| `get_affected_flows` | `changed_files`, `base` |
| `semantic_search_nodes` | `query`, `kind`, `limit` |
| `query_graph` | `pattern`, `target`, `detail_level` |
| `traverse_graph` | `query`, `mode` (bfs/dfs), `depth`, `token_budget` |
| `find_large_functions` | `min_lines`, `kind`, `file_path_pattern` |
| `get_architecture_overview` | (none) |
| `get_hub_nodes` | `top_n` |
| `get_bridge_nodes` | `top_n` |
| `get_knowledge_gaps` | (none) |
| `get_surprising_connections` | `top_n` |
| `get_suggested_questions` | (none) |
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!