Diagnosis-only investigation of a failure with unknown cause - reproduce, localize, reduce, deliver root cause with evidence. Read-only; an explicit fix request routes by target and tier instead, never here.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ReinaMacCredy/maestro --skill maestro-diagnose --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Maestro Diagnose?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/reinamaccredy-maestro-diagnose)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: maestro-diagnose
description: Diagnosis-only investigation of a failure with unknown cause - reproduce, localize, reduce, deliver root cause with evidence. Read-only; an explicit fix request routes by target and tier instead, never here.
review-date: 2026-11-28
---
<!-- maestro-skill-version: dev -->
# maestro-diagnose
Find the cause; change nothing. Any tier may use it.
1. **Reproduce.** Capture the exact failing command or input and its output.
No reproduction: say so and stop; do not guess from symptoms.
2. **Localize.** Bisect the surface: which layer, module, commit, or input
feature flips the behavior. Prefer evidence (logs, minimal harnesses,
`git bisect`) over reading and speculating.
3. **Reduce.** Shrink to the smallest input or state that still fails.
4. **Deliver.** Root cause plus its evidence chain, the reduced reproduction,
and the smallest fix direction. With a work item: `maestro work note <id>`
carries the one-line cause and the reproduction command; in a bundle, also
the NOTES.md Current State. Otherwise the conversation.
## Discipline
- Every probe follows a written hypothesis, "I believe X causes this because
Y", then the minimal test that can falsify it. No hypothesis, no probe.
- Recall first: `maestro search "<symptom>"` and `maestro attention`. A
prior `failed:` note on the same mechanism is evidence about which
hypotheses are already refuted.
- Three refuted hypotheses in a row: stop treating this as a local bug.
Question the architecture; a structural cause or an unsettled design
decision is `maestro-design` work, not a fourth probe.
- Red flags that mean return to step 1: proposing a fix before the cause is
known, changing several things at once, "probably X" without a check.
Diagnosis is read-only toward production code: instrumentation and harnesses
live outside production paths or are reverted before delivery.
An explicit fix request routes by target and tier (`maestro-bundle` tier
rule): a quickfix or Light fix proceeds directly with the diagnosis as its
first step; Full-tier scope is `maestro-work` inside the bundle, with the
diagnosis as its first phase; a prototype fix belongs to `maestro-explore`.
Never downgrade a requested fix to analysis.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!