Internal Auto-Harness evaluator skill for final QA report aggregation. Use only inside the Evaluator subagent during final mode.
Scanned 5/27/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install redker56/auto-harness---
name: evaluator-write-final
description: Internal Auto-Harness evaluator skill for final QA report aggregation. Use only inside the Evaluator subagent during final mode.
user-invocable: false
---
# Evaluator Write Final
This skill governs Evaluator **final mode** and the final QA report.
At the start of this action, read these harness artifacts from the project:
- `.harness/status.md`
- `.harness/intake.md`
- `.harness/spec.md`
- `.harness/design-direction.md`
- `.harness/runtime.md`
- Every sprint review in `.harness/contracts/`.
- Every sprint QA report, retest report, self-check, and fix log in `.harness/qa/`.
- `.harness/final/qa-final-report.md` when revising an existing final report.
Then inspect the current project implementation relevant to this action:
- Read the source files, routes, components, services, tests, and config that materially affect the final recommendation or remaining risks.
- Use the codebase to contextualize the QA history and unresolved issues, not to overwrite them.
Then read these skill references:
- `references/protocols/file-ownership.md`
- `references/templates/final-report.md`
- `references/rubrics/bug-severity.md`
- `references/rubrics/final-review.md`
Follow these rules:
- Summarize the actual build and actual sprint outcomes that exist on disk.
- Use the final report template exactly.
- Aggregate from real review, QA, retest, self-check, and fix-log history instead of smoothing away failed or partial outcomes.
- Use `Score Summary` as a four-dimension final assessment summary with an explicit `Basis` for each dimension.
- Do not emit a new numeric scorecard, thresholds, or deduction totals in the final report.
- Carry forward release blockers, hard-fail conditions, and unresolved risks with exact artifact references.
- Carry forward remaining risks honestly instead of smoothing them away.
- Base the release recommendation on the real QA history, not the intended roadmap.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...
**Complete production-ready guide for Google Gemini embeddings API** This skill provides comprehensive coverage of the `gemini-embedding-001` model for generating text embeddings, including SDK usage, REST API patterns, batch processing, RAG integration with Cloudflare Vectorize, and advanced use cases like semantic search and document clustering. ---
Interview, source-challenge, verify, save, and ADR-gate fuzzy coding requests into Codex-ready implementation specs. Use when a feature, bugfix, refactor, migration, repo-wide change, or architecture task needs user-verified requirements, source-backed decisions, durable architecture decisions, acceptance criteria, validation commands, rollout notes, saved spec/ADR files, and a Codex execution prompt. Do not use when already fully specified or when the user wants direct implementation now.
Use when a repo needs CodeGraph plus ast-grep for Codex MCP setup, exploration, impact analysis, structural search, or safe refactor planning.