Skip to content
Back to skills

Ripwire Reuse First

ASecurity

About to write ONE symbol (even a 'quick' one-liner) or add a dependency: reuse before you reinvent. Finds the building block that already exists, the house pattern to imitate, the duplicate you'd recreate, a vendored dependency. An interface or whole feature → before-you-build. One --exemplar or --grep call at most.

  • 2,393 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 4, 2026
ai-agentsgobashgitapi

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 21, 2026

npx -y skills add redhat-et/ripwire --skill ripwire-reuse-first --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ripwire Reuse First?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ripwire Reuse First
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/redhat-et-ripwire-reuse-first/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/redhat-et-ripwire-reuse-first)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ripwire-reuse-first
description: >
  About to write ONE symbol (even a 'quick' one-liner) or add a dependency: reuse before you reinvent.
  Finds the building block that already exists, the house pattern to imitate, the duplicate you'd
  recreate, a vendored dependency. An interface or whole feature → before-you-build. One --exemplar or --grep call
  at most.
allowed-tools: Bash, Read
---

# Reuse before you write

> Routing — pick the right door:
> • Starting a whole FEATURE (multi-symbol, needs a plan / interface / sizing) → **ripwire-before-you-build**.
> • The cross-cutting *map-before-you-read* token discipline for any read → **ripwire-orient** (`map-before-you-read.md`).
> • Judging whether what you wrote got better or worse before "done" → **ripwire-quality-bar**.
> • Not sure which skill? → **ripwire-router**.

The cheapest, simplest, most readable code is the code you don't write. Before authoring anything
non-trivial, spend one `ripwire` call (on PATH) to find what already exists.

## Retrieve by ROLE, never by raw similarity
This is the load-bearing rule, not a style preference: **similarity-retrieved "here's similar code, paste
it" measurably HURTS** — up to **−15% Pass@1** (arXiv:2503.20589). What
helps is API/type-signature context (+17-20%) and dependency-graph-structured retrieval (+6 EM; enabled 5/6
multi-file edits vs 0/6 without a graph). ripwire's shape — signatures + call-graph + role-ranked exemplars —
is the validated retrieval shape; "find me a similar-looking snippet" is the anti-pattern to avoid, even
though it's the tempting first instinct.

## Before you write a function / class / util
1. **Find the building block first** — `ripwire <dir> --for="<what you're about to build>"` → ranked existing
   signatures (plus, when the code has them, the `<lego>` / `<compose>` HAS-A blocks — what a class already
   owns; a block that would cost more than its count arrives as a counted stub, `shown="0"` with a `next=`,
   and `--sections=lego,compose` restores both in full). If you can name the helper you suspect exists, query it verbatim (`--for="parseByteSize"`) — `--for`
   auto-routes to name-exact retrieval and lands it at recall@1 ~99%. It also carries
   the quality lens (`cx`/`ccx`/`in`/`churn`/`amp`/`tested`) so you see which
   candidates are safe to extend. Often the thing exists — compose from it.
2. **Optionally get a style/shape exemplar** — if the retrieval result leaves a local-idiom question,
   `ripwire <dir> --exemplar=fn|method|class|struct|iface|var --legend=compact` (a kind) or
   `--exemplar="<task in words>"` (the top match's kind is inferred) returns the repo's single best-in-class
   instance of that shape: highest fan-in, lowest cognitive complexity, `tested=1` where possible — selected
   by ROLE, **not** text similarity. It returns the full body under `<bodies>`. **Copy its shape (structure,
   error handling, naming), not its text** — it is a model to imitate, not a relevant-code search.
3. **Find candidates by behavior/shape** — `ripwire <dir> --grep="<a word from the behavior>" --legend=compact`, or a NARROWED
   graph query: `--graph-query='and(file(all,"<area>"),kind(all,fn))'`. (Bare `kind(all,fn)` is ranked by
   importance + capped at `--top-k`, so it's safe — but narrowing by `file()`/`name()`/`callers()` finds the
   *relevant* building block, not just the globally-important one.) → implementations to reuse or extend.
4. **Don't duplicate** — `ripwire <dir> --clones --legend=compact` → if your intended body matches an existing one, call it
   instead. **Rule of Three:** extract a shared helper on the *third* occurrence, not the second — and prefer
   a little duplication over the *wrong* abstraction (a helper you bend with boolean flags is worse than two
   honest copies).

## Before you add a dependency
5. **Is it already here?** — `ripwire <dir> --external-surface --legend=compact` (what the tree already depends on; the default is a
   100-row window with the sh builtins dropped and counted as `builtins_excluded=` — `--include-builtins` keeps them) and
   `--uses=NAME` (the import role). Reuse an in-tree dependency before adding a new one: a new dep is build
   weight, supply-chain surface, and one more thing every reader must learn — it has to earn its place.
6. **Before adding/vendoring a NEW dependency, map the candidate repo first** — `ripwire <git-url>` (https://
   or git@; shallow-clones to a temp cache dir, then maps it like any local tree — `--refetch` forces a fresh
   clone instead of reusing the cached one). Run `--report`/`--hotspots`/`--deps` on it before you commit to
   the dependency: is it actually small and well-factored, or a god-file waiting to become your problem?

## When you do write
- **Match the local idiom** — `ripwire <dir> --for="<the area>"` shows the surrounding naming, layout, and
  error-handling style. Mirror it so your diff reads like the file, not like a graft (cache-friendly for the
  reader and for KV-cache reuse).
- **Less code wins on every metric at once:** lower complexity, fewer call edges, smaller blast radius, less
  to test, less to read. When in doubt, delete a parameter before adding one.

Then hand off to **`ripwire-quality-bar`** before you call it done.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.