Locate the code behind a bug when you don't yet know where it lives. Use when you have a SYMPTOM (a crash, an exception, wrong output, a failing test, an error string) and need to find the responsible symbol — whether you have no idea where it is, suspect a subsystem, or just broke it with a change of your own (even a deploy) — including "it worked yesterday and now it is broken". A stack trace's frames map straight onto indexed symbols, innermost first. Pick the path that fits what you know:...
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add redhat-et/ripwire --skill ripwire-find-bug --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ripwire Find Bug?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/redhat-et-ripwire-find-bug)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ripwire-find-bug
description: >
Locate the code behind a bug when you don't yet know where it lives. Use when you have a SYMPTOM (a crash,
an exception, wrong output, a failing test, an error string) and need to find the responsible symbol —
whether you have no idea where it is, suspect a subsystem, or just broke it with a change of your own
(even a deploy) — including "it worked yesterday and now it is broken". A stack trace's frames map
straight onto indexed symbols, innermost first. Pick the path that fits what you know: pure symptom →
rank candidates; a hunch → narrow
to a subsystem; "I changed X and it broke" → --situ regression trace. One clear --for hit plus one focused
source read that explains the symptom is enough — implement the fix; don't chain more verbs or open other
skills first. Backed by ripwire's call graph + hotspots + co-change (deterministic, on PATH).
allowed-tools: Bash, Read
---
# Find the bug with ripwire
> Nearest neighbours:
> • You already know the symbol and just want to understand it → **ripwire-navigate**.
> • You want the blast radius / tests for a *change* (not to find a bug) → **ripwire-change-check**.
> • Repo-wide quality once-over, no specific symptom → **ripwire-fresh-eyes**.
> • "Why don't I see feature X?" and nothing looks broken — the code may be built but compiled/flagged OFF,
> not buggy: `ripwire <dir> --flags[=SUBSTR]` (`--flip=NAME` for the blast radius of turning one ON) —
> lives in **ripwire-fresh-eyes**, worth a look before you go hunting for a bug that isn't one.
`<dir>` = repo root. Calls are warm after the first parse — chain freely. **Pick the branch that matches
what you already know**; each converges on the same evidence trail (relevance × maintenance pain × blast
radius), so you can escalate between them.
**Evidence-sufficiency stop:** escalate only while the responsible code is still ambiguous. If `--for`
ranks one file/symbol clearly and a focused source read explains the symptom with a minimal fix, stop
retrieval and implement/validate it. Do not automatically add `--hotspots`, `--impact`, another skill, or a
whole-file read after the defect is already proven; those answer different questions and can cost more than
the original localization. Resume the ladder only when the source contradicts the candidate, several
candidates remain plausible, or the change's blast radius is itself part of the task.
## Branch A — "I have a symptom, no idea where it lives"
1. **Symptom search** — `ripwire <dir> --for="<symptom in plain words>"`
`<sigs>` ranked by relevance — signatures + doc-comments closest to the symptom. The `in=` reuse count
and `cx=` complexity are inline; **prefer high-`cx`, high-`in` matches** — complex, widely-called code
fails in more ways. If the bundle says `weak="1"`, reformulate — split camelCase terms, add synonyms
from the domain, or quote an exact path/symbol from the issue — before trusting the ranking below it.
2. **If several candidates remain, maintenance hotspots** — `ripwire <dir> --hotspots`
`<hotspots>` ranked by `score = churn × ccx`; `top=` names the worst function per file. Bugs cluster in
high-score files — **cross with step 1: a symbol in both lists is your prime suspect.**
3. **If the symptom is broad, blast radius of each remaining candidate** — `ripwire <dir> --impact=SYM`
for the top 2–3 from step 1.
`<impact of="SYM" defs="D" reaches="N">` lists everything that reaches SYM. A large `reaches` count is
consistent with a symptom that appears in many places — that's the root, not a downstream effect.
4. **Read narrowly** — start with the top symbol/body or the smallest source range that can confirm or
reject it. Use the hotspot intersection only when step 1 did not already isolate a defensible candidate.
## Branch B — "I suspect a subsystem — narrow it"
1. **Symptom-to-code** — `ripwire <dir> --for="<symptom>"` → note the `p=` (file paths) of the top 5. Which
directories recur? That's your first narrowing.
2. **Hotspots in those directories** — `ripwire <dir> --hotspots` → files that are relevant to the symptom
AND high churn+complexity are the most likely bug homes.
3. **Find the exact emit site** — `ripwire <dir> --grep="ERROR_STRING"` (literal + enclosing symbol) or
`--regex="pattern"`. Add `--grep-context=N` (or `--grep-before=N`/`--grep-after=N`) for ripgrep-style
lines of source around each hit — often enough to confirm the bug without a follow-up `--expand`. The
enclosing symbol (`in=`) is ground truth — now `--callers=SYM` to trace up one level to the true root.
## Branch C — "I changed X and now something's broken" (regression)
1. **Situational awareness on the change** — `ripwire <dir> --situ=fileA.cpp,fileB.h` (or bare `--situ` to
read from `git diff`). Emits, in one pass:
- **blast radius** — everything that transitively reaches the changed symbols
- **tests to run now** (`--affected` under the hood)
- **co-change partners NOT in your diff** — files that historically move together (hidden coupling)
2. **Who calls the broken symbol** — `ripwire <dir> --callers=SYM` → each recorded caller (a floor — counts_floor=) is a candidate for an
unexpected side-effect.
3. **Co-change history** — `ripwire <dir> --cochange=fileA.cpp` → partners ranked by `deg` (fraction of
commits). A `surprising="1"` partner has no `#include` link — pure behavioural coupling, the non-obvious
suspect.
4. **Read** the functions that appear in BOTH the blast radius and the co-change list first.
## Branch D — "I have a stack trace / sanitizer report / compiler error"
You have the failing artifact's TEXT (a Python traceback, an ASan/UBSan report, a node/js stack, a
clang/gcc diagnostic) — don't hand-translate its frames into queries one by one. Pipe it straight in:
1. **Map the trace onto symbols** — `ripwire <dir> --from-trace=FILE` (or `--from-trace=-` to read the
trace from stdin, e.g. `pytest ... 2>&1 | ripwire <dir> --from-trace=-`). Table-driven frame extraction
(python / asan / node / compiler / generic), ranked **innermost-first** over the frames that resolve to
your indexed code. Out-of-corpus frames (stdlib, vendored deps) are listed and counted, never ranked.
2. **Read rank 1 first** — the `innermost="1"` suspect is the crash/throw site; its FULL body is emitted
inline, the other suspects as signatures. `skipped=` tells you how many frames fell outside every root.
3. **Compose the budget** — `--from-trace=FILE --token-budget=N` fits the bundle to N tokens for a tight
context window. Unparseable input refuses loudly (never a misleading empty map).
4. **Or skip the run-read-paste loop entirely** — `ripwire <dir> --run-trace="make -j"` RUNS the
build/test command itself (`sh -c`, your user, your environment — the make trust model, no sandbox)
and, on a non-zero exit, serves the SAME from-trace bundle for the captured output plus a token-frugal
`<lines view="relevant">` cut of the error/frame-shaped output lines. Exit 0 gets a minimal success
record and no bundle — nothing failed, nothing to map. The command's own exit code is always disclosed
(`<run exit=>`), and `--run-timeout=SECONDS` caps a hanging command (default 600 s, reported
`timed_out="1"` honestly, never as an empty success).
## Output
Report the branch you took, then: ranked candidate symbol(s) with `name`, `file:line`, and why (from
`--for`); their hotspot score if present; their blast-radius count (`--impact reaches=`); the error site's
enclosing symbol if `--grep` found it; and any `surprising="1"` co-change partner (branch C). Recommend the
top 1–2 to inspect first, with the evidence trail.
**Honesty:** the call graph gives *structure*; `--slice=SYM:VAR` (add `--slice-flow=back|fwd|both` for the
transitive reaching-definition walk) gives *intra-procedural, name-based* data flow — reach for it on a
wrong-value symptom instead of re-reading the whole function by eye. Its own legend discloses the limits
that matter here, so trust that over this line: statement/line-granular, flow-sensitive reaching definitions inside one function for C-family/Python and source-ordered for JS/Go/Java/Rust (the root's `reach=` says which; each use row's `rd=` lists its reaching def lines),
no alias analysis, block scopes separated (a shadowed name's rows carry `b=`, the declaration each binds to; `pp="1"` marks a build-dependent `#ifdef` row), and it stops at the function boundary (chain
`--callers`/`--impact` for the inter-procedural half). For use-after-move / taint / null / type bugs that
cross that boundary you still need the compiler — use these results to focus *where* to look, not as proof.
A high-`amb` symbol can be a dispatch hub, not the bug.
**Found it?** Pin the gotcha with `ripwire <dir> --note-add="SYM_or_path: what actually went wrong"` — the
next agent (or you, next session) gets it automatically the next time `--for`/`--expand` surfaces that symbol.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!