Skip to content
Back to skills

Ztu Visual Benchmark

ASecurity

Render multiple real design variants and compare reproducible screenshots, brand criteria, accessibility and measured web performance.

  • 14 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 7, 2026
designapiperformance

Works with

  • cli
  • api
  • mcp

Security analysis

A92/100
  • mediumInstalls packages at runtime which could introduce malicious dependencies

Pro shows the line behind each finding and how to fix it

Scanned November 7, 2026

npx -y skills add Realjustawall/Perfect-AI --skill ztu-visual-benchmark --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ztu Visual Benchmark?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ztu Visual Benchmark
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/realjustawall-ztu-visual-benchmark/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/realjustawall-ztu-visual-benchmark)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ztu-visual-benchmark
description: "Render multiple real design variants and compare reproducible screenshots, brand criteria, accessibility and measured web performance."
---
# Visual Benchmark Laboratory — Perfect_AI VERIFIED ULTIMATE

## Mission / ماموریت
Render multiple real design variants and compare reproducible screenshots, brand criteria, accessibility and measured web performance.

## When to invoke
When choosing a design direction or validating fidelity.

## Exact workflow
1. Define 3+ variants with stable seed, same copy, content and viewport.
2. Run `npm run benchmark` inside `examples/visual-benchmark` after npm install.
3. Capture desktop/mobile screenshots, store DOM metadata, timings and console errors.
4. Use objective gates for overflow/accessibility/contrast; have independent human or visual reviewer judge artistic originality; do not claim automated aesthetics measure taste.
5. Save decision matrix with provenance, weighting and screenshots.

## Acceptance criteria
- Every candidate has the same viewport and input.
- Broken UX fails regardless of perceived aesthetics.
- Report separates measured and subjective ratings.
- The first run does not overwrite approved screenshots.

## Evidence contract
Write a machine-readable report with `status` = `pass|fail|unverified`, measured values, runtime/browser/device, changed files, exact command, artifacts and rationale. **Never** claim hardware/browser success from unit tests alone. Preserve original project files unless user explicitly authorizes edits. Avoid MCP; use local CLI and files.

## Compatibility and precautions
Read the installed dependency versions and project conventions first; prefer official APIs. Respect reduced motion, keyboard navigation, privacy, Persian RTL and low-power devices. Do not let two animation engines own the same DOM property. Test fallback modes and undo changes when the same acceptance check regresses.

## Working files
- `../../references/visual-benchmark-implementation.md`
- `../../examples/visual-benchmark/README.md`

## Official references
- https://playwright.dev/docs/test-projects
- https://playwright.dev/docs/test-snapshots

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.