Skip to content
Back to skills

Coding Discipline

ASecurity

Karpathy-inspired coding discipline — think before coding, simplicity first, surgical changes, goal-driven execution — with real-world wrong/right examples. Use when implementing, reviewing, or fixing code that shows hidden assumptions, overcomplication, scope creep, or vague success criteria.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 4, 2026
ai-agentsgorailsgit

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 4, 2026

npx -y skills add rbhattarai/se-harness --skill coding-discipline --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Coding Discipline?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Coding Discipline
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/rbhattarai-coding-discipline/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/rbhattarai-coding-discipline)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: coding-discipline
description: Karpathy-inspired coding discipline — think before coding, simplicity first, surgical changes, goal-driven execution — with real-world wrong/right examples. Use when implementing, reviewing, or fixing code that shows hidden assumptions, overcomplication, scope creep, or vague success criteria.
---

# Coding Discipline

Behavioral guardrails against common LLM coding mistakes. Source:
https://github.com/multica-ai/andrej-karpathy-skills (derived from Karpathy's
observations on LLM coding pitfalls). Full wrong/right examples: `EXAMPLES.md`
in this directory.

## The four principles

1. **Think before coding** — state assumptions explicitly; present multiple
   interpretations instead of picking silently; push back when a simpler approach
   exists; stop and ask when confused.
2. **Simplicity first** — minimum code that solves the problem; no speculative
   features, single-use abstractions, unrequested configurability, or
   impossible-scenario handling. Test: would a senior engineer call this
   overcomplicated?
3. **Surgical changes** — touch only what the task requires; don't "improve"
   adjacent code, comments, or formatting; match existing style; mention unrelated
   dead code, don't delete it; clean up only orphans your changes created. Test:
   every changed line traces to the request.
4. **Goal-driven execution** — turn tasks into verifiable goals ("fix bug X" →
   "write a failing test for X, then make it pass"); for multi-step work state each
   step with its verification; loop until verified.

**Tradeoff:** these bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.

## When to open EXAMPLES.md

Open it when you catch yourself (or a diff under review) doing any of: assuming
scope/format/fields the user didn't state; reaching for an abstraction before the
second use case; reformatting or "improving" lines outside the task; starting work
with no test or check that would prove it done.

Files in this skill

  • EXAMPLES.md14.4 KB
  • SKILL.md1.9 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.