Delegate coding tasks to the Grok Build CLI only when the user explicitly requests it, while the orchestrator retains review and landing responsibility.
6 stars
0 votes
0 copies
4 views
Added September 11, 2026
ai-agentsrustgoshellbashnodegitapi
Works with
claude code
cursor
cli
api
Security analysis
A92/100
mediumInstalls packages at runtime which could introduce malicious dependencies
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Grok Delegate?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ranbot-ai-grok-delegate)
---
name: grok-delegate
description: Delegate coding tasks to the Grok Build CLI only when the user explicitly requests it, while the orchestrator retains review and landing responsibility.
category: AI & Agents
source: antigravity
tags: [node, api, claude, ai, agent, template, design, rag]
url: https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills/tree/main/skills/grok-delegate
---
# Grok Delegate
## When to Use
- You want to delegate a bounded coding task to a separate `grok` implementer (`Grok Build`) and then review its diff yourself.
- The user explicitly asked for delegation to this implementer.
You are the **orchestrator**. This skill lets you hand a bounded coding task to a separate
**implementer** — the Grok Build CLI (`grok`) — then review what it produced and land it yourself. You
write the brief and own the judgment; Grok does the typing under an explicit autonomy profile; you
verify and commit.
Nothing here is specific to one orchestrating agent. The loop needs only the ability to run a shell
command and read a file, so it works the same whether you are Claude Code, Cursor, OpenCode with a
selected model, or any comparable agent. (It is designed for Claude Code and Cursor; treat other
orchestrators as designed-for, not yet proven.)
## When NOT to use this
- The task is small enough to just do inline — delegation overhead is not worth it.
- The `grok` CLI is not installed, not authenticated, or the account lacks Grok Build beta access.
- You want to write the code yourself, or you only need a review without an implementer run.
## Prerequisites (check once)
1. `grok version` succeeds. If not, install on any platform with
`npm i -g @xai-official/grok` (or use the installer from xAI's official Grok CLI docs) and
authenticate (`grok login`, or `grok login --device-auth` on headless hosts, or set
`XAI_API_KEY`).
2. **Confirm which `grok` is on PATH.** `command -v grok` shows the active binary and `grok version`
its version — the relay records the version it ran into `result.json`, so a stale binary is visible
after the fact.
3. You are in (or will point `--cd` at) the target git repository.
## The loop
Run these five steps per task. Steps 1, 4, and 5 are your judgment; 2 and 3 are mechanical.
### 1. Write the brief
Grok sees **only** the text you send — no orchestrator chat history, no shared context. Everything the
task needs goes in the brief: the goal, the current state, what to change, what to leave untouched,
the project's **actual** gate commands (discover them from the repo's CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md/Makefile —
do not assume), and a report contract. Tell Grok it will **not** commit (you will). Keep one task per
brief. Full guidance and a template: [references/writing-the-brief.md](references/writing-the-brief.md).
### 2. Dispatch
Send the brief to Grok with the bundled helper. It wraps `grok -p`, captures the run, and writes a
structured `result.json` — so your only job is "run a command, read a file." (`<skill-dir>` below is
this skill's installed directory — the folder containing this `SKILL.md`, i.e. the directory you loaded
the skill from. Claude Code prints it as "Base directory for this skill" when the skill loads; on other
orchestrators use that same directory — if unsure where it landed, run
`find ~ -name relay.mjs -path '*grok-delegate*'` and substitute the directory above it.)
```bash
node "<skill-dir>/scripts/relay.mjs" --brief brief.txt --cd /path/to/repo
# read-only (review/diagnosis; best-effort — verify touchedFiles): add --read-only
# continue the previous Grok session: add --resume-last (send only the delta brief)
# hard time limit (watchdog): add --timeout 2h (default: off; implementation runs routinely need 1-2h)
# see all options: node .../relay.mjs --help
```
The helper defaults to a write-capable (`workspace-write`) autonomy profile — `--always-approve` plus
`--sandbox workspace` — and writes its artifacts to a temp dir, so the repo under review stays clean.
It **never commits** — see step 5. Mechanics, flags, and the `result.json` shape:
[references/dispatch-and-poll.md](references/dispatch-and-poll.md).
### 3. Wait for completion
The helper blocks until Grok finishes, so back it with whatever your orchestrator offers and resume
when it returns:
- **Claude Code:** run the Bash call with `run_in_background: true`; you are notified on completion.
- **Plain shell / other agents:** run it in the foreground for short tasks, or background it and poll
the result file — `… &` in bash/zsh (including Git Bash/WSL), or your shell's equivalent (`Start-Job`
in PowerShell, `start /b` in cmd). The run is done when `result.json` exists with a `status`. (A
pre-run usage error — bad args or an empty brief — instead exits with code 2 and a stderr message and
writes no result file, so check the exit code too. A missing `grok` binary exits 127 but *does* write
a `result.json` with status `grok_unavailable`.)
Do not trust progress trackers over reality: a run is finished when `result.json` is written and the
process has exited. Read the working tree, not a status line. The implementer's full report is
the `finalMessage` field in `result.json` (also printed in full on stdout between the report markers).
### 4. Review — do not trust the self-report
Grok's `result.json` includes its own