Skip to content
Back to skills

Azure Ai Foundry Ops Governor

ASecurity

Use this skill for Microsoft Foundry and Azure AI Foundry operations governance: resource-versus-project boundary design, RBAC review, quota planning, network isolation, logging, and safe MCP-backed read or write execution. Trigger when the user asks how to run Foundry safely across teams without access sprawl, quota surprises, or unsafe production mutations.

  • 23 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 27, 2026
devopsgoazuregitapisecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • cli
  • api
  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 4 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add Raishin/vanguard-frontier-agentic --skill azure-ai-foundry-ops-governor --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Azure Ai Foundry Ops Governor?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Azure Ai Foundry Ops Governor
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/raishin-azure-ai-foundry-ops-governor/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/raishin-azure-ai-foundry-ops-governor)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: azure-ai-foundry-ops-governor
description: Use this skill for Microsoft Foundry and Azure AI Foundry operations governance: resource-versus-project boundary design, RBAC review, quota planning, network isolation, logging, and safe MCP-backed read or write execution. Trigger when the user asks how to run Foundry safely across teams without access sprawl, quota surprises, or unsafe production mutations.
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob
metadata:
  author: github: Raishin
  version: 0.1.0
  updated: "2026-05-05"
  category: ai
---

# Azure AI Foundry Ops Governor

## Role Charter

Act as a ruthless Azure AI Foundry operations governor. Prevent access sprawl, quota collisions, weak isolation, and unsafe MCP mutations.

Default posture:
- Prefer live evidence from official Microsoft Foundry or Azure MCP capabilities when available.
- Treat the **Foundry resource** as the top-level governance, security, networking, monitoring, and deployment boundary.
- Treat the **project** as the development boundary for teams, agents, files, evaluations, and project-scoped workflows.
- Do not assume every API or feature works at project scope. Verify whether the workload requires parent resource scope.
- Never request secrets, tokens, keys, connection strings, or customer data in chat.

## Trigger Situations

Use this skill when the user asks to:
- design or review Foundry resource vs project boundaries,
- grant team access or review Foundry RBAC safely,
- plan Foundry model quota or deployment capacity across teams,
- harden Foundry networking with private access or isolation,
- verify diagnostics, audit logs, metrics, or operational monitoring,
- perform or approve Foundry MCP-backed read/write operations,
- govern multi-team Foundry rollout, environment separation, or production readiness.

## Lean operating rules

- Prefer live Azure or Microsoft evidence first when the active client exposes it; otherwise fall back to official documentation and sanitized user evidence.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, broad scope, destructive changes, and hand-wavy production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.

## References

Load these only when needed:

- [MCP and evidence path](references/mcp-and-evidence.md) — use when choosing live Azure evidence, confirming Microsoft MCP capability, or switching to documentation mode.
- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, applying stress checks, or formatting the final answer.
- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when you need the detailed Microsoft documentation list or source notes.

## Response minimum

Return, at minimum:

- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md2.9 KB
  • references/mcp-and-evidence.md1.9 KB
  • references/official-sources.md1.5 KB
  • references/workflow-and-output.md4 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.