Skip to content
Back to skills

Reviewing Typescript

ASecurity

Provides concise, focused TypeScript/React code reviews matching exact task complexity requirements. Use when reviewing TypeScript code quality, type safety, or when the user asks for code review.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added September 5, 2026
ai-agentstypescriptreacttestinggitsecurityperformance

Works with

  • claude code

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 25, 2026

npx -y skills add qte77/claude-code-plugins --skill reviewing-typescript --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Reviewing Typescript?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Reviewing Typescript
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qte77-reviewing-typescript/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qte77-reviewing-typescript)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: reviewing-typescript
description: Provides concise, focused TypeScript/React code reviews matching exact task complexity requirements. Use when reviewing TypeScript code quality, type safety, or when the user asks for code review.
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code
metadata:
  allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, WebFetch, WebSearch
  argument-hint: [file-or-directory]
  stability: stable
  content-hash: sha256:b285fa9c65674635325a88669c5f6662ef5059d788e570b57ded2804eaf7b57e
---

# Review Context

- Changed files: !`git diff --name-only HEAD~1 2>/dev/null || echo "No recent commits"`
- Staged files: !`git diff --staged --name-only`

## Code Review

**Scope**: $ARGUMENTS

Delivers **focused, streamlined** TypeScript/React code reviews matching stated task
requirements exactly. No over-analysis.

## TypeScript Standards

See `references/typescript-best-practices.md` for comprehensive TypeScript guidelines.

## Workflow

1. **Read task requirements** to understand expected scope
2. **Check validation passes** before detailed review
3. **Match review depth** to task complexity (simple vs complex)
4. **Validate requirements** — does implementation match task scope exactly?
5. **Issue focused feedback** with specific file paths and line numbers

## Review Strategy

**Simple Tasks (single module)**: Type safety, error handling, requirements match,
basic quality

**Complex Tasks (multi-module)**: Above plus architecture, React patterns,
async correctness, comprehensive testing

**Always**: Use existing project patterns, check for `any` types

## Review Checklist

**Type Safety & Security**:

- [ ] No `any` types (use `unknown` with type guards)
- [ ] Proper generics and discriminated unions
- [ ] All external input validated at boundaries
- [ ] No secrets or credentials in source code

**React Patterns**:

- [ ] No unnecessary re-renders (proper memoization only when needed)
- [ ] Correct useEffect dependency arrays
- [ ] Custom hooks extracted for shared logic
- [ ] Accessibility: semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation

**Bundle & Performance**:

- [ ] No barrel imports of large libraries (import specific modules)
- [ ] Dynamic imports for heavy components
- [ ] No blocking operations in render path

**Requirements Match**:

- [ ] Implements exactly what was requested
- [ ] No over-engineering or scope creep
- [ ] Appropriate complexity level

**Code Quality**:

- [ ] Follows project patterns in `src/`
- [ ] Proper error handling with Result types or try/catch
- [ ] Tests cover stated functionality
- [ ] ESM imports used consistently

**Structural Health**:

- [ ] No function exceeds cyclomatic complexity 12 (`complexity`) or cognitive complexity 15 (`sonarjs/cognitive-complexity`)
- [ ] No copy-paste duplication across modules
- [ ] Barrel exports used sparingly and intentionally

## Output Standards

**Simple Tasks**: CRITICAL issues only, clear approval when requirements met
**Complex Tasks**: CRITICAL/WARNINGS/SUGGESTIONS with specific fixes
**All reviews**: Concise, streamlined, no unnecessary complexity analysis

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md2.9 KB
  • references/typescript-best-practices.md69 B

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.