Back to skills
SKILL.md
Reviewing Go
ASecurityProvides concise, focused Go code reviews matching exact task complexity requirements. Use when reviewing Go code quality, concurrency safety, or when the user asks for code review.
- 2 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 1 view
- Added September 5, 2026
Works with
Security analysis
100/100Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding
npx -y skills add qte77/claude-code-plugins --skill reviewing-go --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Reviewing Go?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qte77-reviewing-go)---
name: reviewing-go
description: Provides concise, focused Go code reviews matching exact task complexity requirements. Use when reviewing Go code quality, concurrency safety, or when the user asks for code review.
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code
metadata:
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, WebFetch, WebSearch
argument-hint: [file-or-directory]
stability: stable
content-hash: sha256:6f31b28e0cea1077916a248eab78da6e097af5d82ed346780e7b31823257fe5a
---
# Review Context
- Changed files: !`git diff --name-only HEAD~1 2>/dev/null || echo "No recent commits"`
- Staged files: !`git diff --staged --name-only`
## Code Review
**Scope**: $ARGUMENTS
Delivers **focused, streamlined** Go code reviews matching stated task
requirements exactly. No over-analysis.
## Go Standards
See `references/go-best-practices.md` for comprehensive Go guidelines.
## Workflow
1. **Read task requirements** to understand expected scope
2. **Check validation passes** before detailed review
3. **Match review depth** to task complexity (simple vs complex)
4. **Validate requirements** — does implementation match task scope exactly?
5. **Issue focused feedback** with specific file paths and line numbers
## Review Strategy
**Simple Tasks (single package)**: Error handling, requirements match,
basic quality
**Complex Tasks (multi-package)**: Above plus architecture, concurrency
patterns, context propagation, comprehensive testing
**Always**: Use existing project patterns, check goroutine lifecycle
## Review Checklist
**Safety & Security**:
- [ ] No ignored errors (every `err` handled or documented)
- [ ] SQL queries use parameterized statements
- [ ] JSON decoder uses `DisallowUnknownFields()` for untrusted input
- [ ] No hardcoded credentials
**Requirements Match**:
- [ ] Implements exactly what was requested
- [ ] No over-engineering or scope creep
- [ ] Appropriate complexity level
**Code Quality**:
- [ ] Follows project patterns
- [ ] Error wrapping uses `fmt.Errorf("context: %w", err)`
- [ ] Interfaces small and defined where consumed
- [ ] `context.Context` passed as first param, not stored in struct
**Concurrency**:
- [ ] Every goroutine has a stop signal (`ctx.Done()` or channel close)
- [ ] Shared state protected by mutex or channels
- [ ] No goroutine leaks
**Structural Health**:
- [ ] No function exceeds cognitive complexity threshold
- [ ] No copy-paste duplication across methods
- [ ] `internal/` used for crate-private packages
## Output Standards
**Simple Tasks**: CRITICAL issues only, clear approval when requirements met
**Complex Tasks**: CRITICAL/WARNINGS/SUGGESTIONS with specific fixes
**All reviews**: Concise, streamlined, no unnecessary complexity analysis
Files in this skill
- SKILL.md
- references/go-best-practices.md
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…
Newsletter
Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.