Back to skills
SKILL.md
Auditing Website Usability
ASecurityAudits website usability for UX optimization, covering forms, navigation, validation, and microcopy. Use when reviewing user experience, task completion flows, or interface friction points.
- 2 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 3 views
- Added September 5, 2026
Works with
Security analysis
100/100npx -y skills add qte77/claude-code-plugins --skill auditing-website-usability --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Auditing Website Usability?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qte77-auditing-website-usability)---
name: auditing-website-usability
description: Audits website usability for UX optimization, covering forms, navigation, validation, and microcopy. Use when reviewing user experience, task completion flows, or interface friction points.
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code
metadata:
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Bash, WebSearch, WebFetch
argument-hint: [url-or-file-path]
stability: stable
content-hash: sha256:0e7c6cbfc6559f5799d96568468a418ca323f0fbd15dc5ed294decd5e56874a8
last-verified-cc-version: 1.0.34
---
# Website Usability Audit
**Target**: $ARGUMENTS
Conducts focused usability audits and generates implementable UX fixes.
Complements `auditing-website-accessibility` (WCAG compliance) with
UX-focused analysis. No overlap: accessibility handles ARIA/contrast/keyboard;
this handles task completion, friction, and clarity.
## Audit Areas
### Forms
- Smart defaults and field reduction
- Logical grouping and progressive disclosure
- Inline validation with helpful messaging
### Navigation
- Information architecture and menu depth (target: <3 levels)
- Mobile usability and touch targets
- Breadcrumbs, search, and task completion paths
### Input Validation
- Real-time feedback and error prevention
- Clear error messages with recovery guidance
- Submission confirmation
### Microcopy
- Button labels, form hints, and instructional text
- Error message clarity and actionability
- User confidence messaging
## Workflow
1. **Identify scope** from $ARGUMENTS (URL, file, or directory)
2. **Audit task flows** - map primary user journeys, identify friction
3. **Inspect forms** - field count, grouping, validation behavior
4. **Review navigation** - menu depth, mobile patterns, findability
5. **Evaluate microcopy** - labels, errors, guidance text
6. **Classify findings** by impact on task completion
7. **Generate fixes** with specific code changes
## Output Format
### Findings
```text
CRITICAL (Task Completion Blockers)
- [Issue] - Impact: [High/Medium/Low] - Element: [selector]
Fix: [Specific code/design change]
Metric: [What improves - conversion, completion, error rate]
OPTIMIZATIONS (Friction Reduction)
- [Issue] - Impact: [High/Medium/Low] - Element: [selector]
Fix: [Specific code/design change]
Metric: [What improves]
```
### Implementation Checklist
```text
- [ ] [Fix description] - Impact: [High/Medium/Low]
```
Group fixes by: Forms, Navigation, Validation, Microcopy.
## Rules
- Prioritize task-completion blockers before friction reduction
- Every finding must include a specific, implementable fix
- No time estimates -- prioritize by impact only
- Defer WCAG/accessibility concerns to `auditing-website-accessibility`
- Keep output concise: findings + fixes + checklist only
## Further Reading
- [Nielsen Norman Group — UX Research](https://www.nngroup.com/articles/)
- [Usability.gov — User Interface Design](https://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/user-interface-design.html)
- [Baymard Institute — UX Benchmarks](https://baymard.com/blog)
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…
Newsletter
Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.