Evaluates zero-shot cross-lingual news recommendation by measuring how effectively a model recommends articles in a target language to users who only consume news in a source language. It probes the model's ability to leverage multilingual sentence embeddings and click behavior fusion without task-specific fine-tuning on the target language. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MIND (small) / xMIND (small), or asks about evaluating this task. Reports nDCG@10.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill zs-xlt-news-rec-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Zs Xlt News Rec Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-zs-xlt-news-rec-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: zs-xlt-news-rec-eval
description: Evaluates zero-shot cross-lingual news recommendation by measuring how effectively a model recommends articles in a target language to users who only consume news in a source language. It probes the model's ability to leverage multilingual sentence embeddings and click behavior fusion without task-specific fine-tuning on the target language. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MIND (small) / xMIND (small), or asks about evaluating this task. Reports nDCG@10.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2406.12634
bibtex_key: iana2024news
confidence: high
---
# zs-xlt-news-rec-eval
> News Without Borders: Domain Adaptation of Multilingual Sentence Embeddings for Cross-lingual News Recommendation — Iana et al. (2024) (arXiv:2406.12634, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates zero-shot cross-lingual news recommendation by measuring how effectively a model recommends articles in a target language to users who only consume news in a source language. It probes the model's ability to leverage multilingual sentence embeddings and click behavior fusion without task-specific fine-tuning on the target language.
## Datasets
- **MIND (small) / xMIND (small)** — total ?; splits: train (124229), val (29498), test (70938)
## Metrics
- `AUC` — range: [0, 1]
- Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve. Measures the probability that a randomly chosen positive instance is ranked higher than a randomly chosen negative instance.
- `MRR` — range: [0, 1]
- Mean Reciprocal Rank. For each query, takes the reciprocal of the rank of the first relevant item, then averages across all queries.
- `nDCG@10` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain at cutoff 10. Computes the weighted sum of relevance scores at each position up to 10, normalized by the ideal DCG@10 for the same set of items.
## Input / output format
**Input**: News article text (title and abstract), category information, named entities (for specific baselines), and a user's click history (capped at 50 items).
**Output**: A ranked list of news articles recommended to the user.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def evaluate(predictions, relevant_items):
# predictions: list of recommended item IDs
# relevant_items: set of ground-truth clicked items
# AUC (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney)
pos = len(relevant_items)
neg = len(predictions) - pos
auc = (sum(1 for r in predictions if r in relevant_items) - pos*(pos+1)/2) / (pos*neg) if pos > 0 and neg > 0 else 0.0
# MRR
rr = 0.0
for rank, item in enumerate(predictions):
if item in relevant_items:
rr = 1.0 / (rank + 1)
break
# nDCG@10
dcg = sum((1.0 if item in relevant_items else 0.0) / math.log2(rank + 2) for rank, item in enumerate(predictions[:10]))
idcg = sum(1.0 / math.log2(i + 2) for i in range(min(pos, 10)))
ndcg = dcg / idcg if idcg > 0 else 0.0
return auc, rr, ndcg
```
## Common pitfalls
- MIND test labels are not publicly released; the authors use the validation set as the test set due to this constraint.
- xMIND statistics in Table 1 are reported per language (14 languages total), not as aggregate counts across all languages.
- Models use different user modeling strategies: some employ parameterized attention/GRU networks, while others use non-parameterized late fusion of click behaviors, affecting direct comparison.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We repeat each experiment three times with the seeds {42,43,44}, set with PyTorch Lightning’s seed_everything, and report the mean and standard deviations for common metrics: AUC, MRR, and nDCG@10. ... Wu et al. [[60]] do not release test labels for MIND. Hence, we use the validation set for testing, and split the training set into temporarily disjoint portions for training (first four days) and validation (last day), as per Table [1].
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{iana2024news,
title={News Without Borders: Domain Adaptation of Multilingual Sentence Embeddings for Cross-lingual News Recommendation},
author={Iana et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2406.12634}
}
```
- arXiv: 2406.12634
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!