Predicts a 1-to-5 star rating for a restaurant review based on its text content. It probes a model's ability to capture sentiment, domain-specific linguistic patterns, and fine-grained textual features for multi-class classification. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Yelp Dataset, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill yelp-rating-prediction-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Yelp Rating Prediction Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-yelp-rating-prediction-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: yelp-rating-prediction-eval
description: Predicts a 1-to-5 star rating for a restaurant review based on its text content. It probes a model's ability to capture sentiment, domain-specific linguistic patterns, and fine-grained textual features for multi-class classification. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Yelp Dataset, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 1605.05362
bibtex_key: asghar2016yelp
confidence: high
---
# yelp-rating-prediction-eval
> Yelp Dataset Challenge: Review Rating Prediction — Asghar (2016) (arXiv:1605.05362, 2016)
## What this evaluates
Predicts a 1-to-5 star rating for a restaurant review based on its text content. It probes a model's ability to capture sentiment, domain-specific linguistic patterns, and fine-grained textual features for multi-class classification.
## Datasets
- **Yelp Dataset** — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of reviews where the predicted star rating matches the ground truth rating.
- `RMSE` — range: other
- Square root of the average squared difference between predicted and actual star ratings.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Preprocessed text review (lowercased, punctuation and stop words removed).
**Output**: Predicted star rating as an integer class label from {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(preds, gold):
n = len(gold)
accuracy = sum(1 for p, g in zip(preds, gold) if p == g) / n
rmse = (sum((p - g) ** 2 for p, g in zip(preds, gold)) / n) ** 0.5
return {'accuracy': accuracy, 'rmse': rmse}
```
## Common pitfalls
- The paper performs 3-fold cross-validation only on the 80% training set for hyperparameter tuning (e.g., SVM C parameter), not for final evaluation on the test set.
- Feature extraction (n-gram dictionaries, TF-IDF, LSI matrices) must be fitted exclusively on the training data to prevent data leakage when scoring the test set.
- Preprocessing steps (lowercasing, stop-word removal, punctuation stripping) are explicitly required before feature extraction and must be applied identically to test reviews.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We use 80% of the dataset for training, and 20% for testing. For each of the sixteen prediction systems, we perform 3-fold cross validation on the training set and compute two metrics, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and accuracy, for the training fold as well as the validation fold.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{asghar2016yelp,
title={Yelp Dataset Challenge: Review Rating Prediction},
author={Asghar (2016)},
year={2016},
note={arXiv:1605.05362}
}
```
- arXiv: 1605.05362

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!