This benchmark evaluates the cross-lingual transfer capability of neural news recommenders. It probes how well models trained monolingually on English news can generate accurate recommendations in 14 other languages under zero-shot and few-shot settings, with and without bilingual user consumption patterns. Use when the user wants to benchmark on xMIND, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AUC.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Xmind Crosslingual Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-xmind-crosslingual-eval)
---
name: xmind-crosslingual-eval
description: This benchmark evaluates the cross-lingual transfer capability of neural news recommenders. It probes how well models trained monolingually on English news can generate accurate recommendations in 14 other languages under zero-shot and few-shot settings, with and without bilingual user consumption patterns. Use when the user wants to benchmark on xMIND, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AUC.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2403.17876
bibtex_key: iana2024mindyourlanguage
confidence: high
---
# xmind-crosslingual-eval
> MIND Your Language: A Multilingual Dataset for Cross-lingual News Recommendation — Iana et al. (2024) (arXiv:2403.17876, 2024)
## What this evaluates
This benchmark evaluates the cross-lingual transfer capability of neural news recommenders. It probes how well models trained monolingually on English news can generate accurate recommendations in 14 other languages under zero-shot and few-shot settings, with and without bilingual user consumption patterns.
## Datasets
- **xMIND** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1); repo https://github.com/andreeaiana/xMIND
## Metrics
- `AUC` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, measuring the probability that a randomly chosen positive instance is ranked higher than a randomly chosen negative instance.
- `MRR` — range: [0, 1]
- Mean Reciprocal Rank, calculated as the average of the reciprocal of the rank of the first relevant item in the recommended list.
- `nDCG@5` — range: [0, 1]
- Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain at cutoff 5, measuring ranking quality by discounting gains logarithmically based on position.
- `nDCG@10` — range: [0, 1]
- Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain at cutoff 10, measuring ranking quality by discounting gains logarithmically based on position.
## Input / output format
**Input**: User click history (up to 50 previously clicked news items with text, categories, and named entities) and a set of candidate news items (text, categories, named entities) to be scored.
**Output**: A ranked list of candidate news items, or a scalar recommendation score per candidate computed as the dot product between the user history representation and the candidate news representation.
## Scoring recipe
```python
import math
def compute_metrics(predictions, gold):
# predictions: list of (score, item_id) sorted descending
# gold: set of relevant item_ids
pos = [s for s, _ in predictions if _ in gold]
neg = [s for s, _ in predictions if _ not in gold]
auc = sum(1 for p in pos for n in neg if p > n) / (len(pos) * len(neg)) if pos and neg else 0.0
mrr = 0.0
for rank, (_, item_id) in enumerate(predictions, 1):
if item_id in gold:
mrr = 1.0 / rank
break
k = 10
dcg = sum(1.0 / math.log2(r + 1) for r, (_, item_id) in enumerate(predictions[:k], 1) if item_id in gold)
idcg = sum(1.0 / math.log2(r + 1) for r in range(1, min(len(gold), k) + 1))
ndcg = dcg / idcg if idcg > 0 else 0.0
return {'AUC': auc, 'MRR': mrr, 'nDCG@10': ndcg}
```
## Common pitfalls
- The test set uses the validation portion of MIND because official test labels were not released, which may not reflect true out-of-distribution performance.
- Hyperparameter tuning is performed exclusively on the English (MIND) dataset, potentially introducing distribution bias that does not generalize to target languages.
- Bilingual consumption is simulated by randomly replacing English news with translated versions, which may not capture real-world bilingual user behavior or language mixing patterns.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We repeat each experiment three times, with different random seeds, and report averages and standard deviations for the standard metrics: AUC, MRR, nDCG@5, and nDCG@10.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{iana2024mindyourlanguage,
title={MIND Your Language: A Multilingual Dataset for Cross-lingual News Recommendation},
author={Iana et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2403.17876}
}
```
- arXiv: 2403.17876