Evaluates machine translation systems for bilingual customer support conversations, focusing on context utilization, discourse coherence, and turn-level versus conversation-level translation quality across five language pairs. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MAIA 2.0, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports COMET.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill wmt24-chat-translation-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Wmt24 Chat Translation Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-wmt24-chat-translation-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: wmt24-chat-translation-eval
description: Evaluates machine translation systems for bilingual customer support conversations, focusing on context utilization, discourse coherence, and turn-level versus conversation-level translation quality across five language pairs. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MAIA 2.0, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports COMET.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2410.11624
bibtex_key: mohammed2024wmt24chattranslation
confidence: high
---
# wmt24-chat-translation-eval
> Findings of the WMT 2024 Shared Task on Chat Translation — Mohammed et al. (2024) (arXiv:2410.11624, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates machine translation systems for bilingual customer support conversations, focusing on context utilization, discourse coherence, and turn-level versus conversation-level translation quality across five language pairs.
## Datasets
- **MAIA 2.0** — total ?; splits: train (79400), dev (12300), test (10000)
## Metrics
- `COMET` **(primary)** — range: [-1, 1]
- Neural reference-based metric trained on human judgments to predict translation quality.
- `BLEU` — range: [0, 1]
- Standard n-gram overlap metric computed with SacreBLEU.
- `chrF` — range: [0, 1]
- Character n-gram F-score computed with SacreBLEU.
- `ContextCometQE` — range: [-1, 1]
- Reference-free metric that uses bilingual context (previous two turns) to assess translation quality.
- `MuDA F1` — range: [0, 1]
- F1 accuracy on four context-dependent discourse phenomena tags: lexical cohesion, formality, pronoun resolution, and verb forms.
- `DA+SQM` — range: [0, 100]
- Human assessment using Direct Assessment and Scalar Quality Metric on a continuous scale from 0 to 100 based on accuracy and grammatical correctness.
- `ContextMQM` — range: other
- LLM-based fine-grained error score aggregating minor, major, and critical errors weighted by 1, 5, and 10 respectively.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Source text in the customer's or agent's language, accompanied by preceding conversation context (full context for human eval, up to 8 turns for LLM eval, or 2 turns for ContextCometQE).
**Output**: Translated text in the target language (agent's or customer's language).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(predictions, gold, sources):
comet_scores = comet_model.predict(hypotheses=predictions, references=gold, sources=sources)
comet_val = comet_scores['scores'].mean()
bleu_val = sacrebleu.corpus_bleu(predictions, [gold]).score / 100
chrf_val = sacrebleu.corpus_chrf(predictions, [gold]).score / 100
muda_f1 = f1_score(tag_discourse(predictions), tag_discourse(gold))
human_val = sum(linguist_scores) / len(linguist_scores)
mqm_val = sum(minor*1 + major*5 + critical*10 for errors in llm_mqm_outputs)
return {'COMET': comet_val, 'BLEU': bleu_val, 'chrF': chrf_val, 'MuDA_F1': muda_f1, 'DA+SQM': human_val, 'ContextMQM': mqm_val}
```
## Common pitfalls
- Turn-level metrics (e.g., BLEU, COMET) often overestimate system capability because performance degrades significantly at the conversation level and in later turns.
- Standard MT metrics fail to capture discourse coherence; context-dependent phenomena like formality and pronoun resolution require specialized tagging or context-aware metrics.
- LLM-based ContextMQM evaluation was restricted to the en-de language pair due to budget constraints, limiting cross-lingual generalizability of fine-grained error analysis.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We use Comet Rei et al. ([2022]) as our primary evaluation metric for assessing translation quality of the submitted systems. Additionally, we report lexical metrics: BLEU and chrF using the SacreBLEU library Post ([2018]). We also include ContextCometQE (Agrawal et al., [2024]), a reference-free metric that uses bilingual context (previous two turns) to assess the translation quality of the current turn.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{mohammed2024wmt24chattranslation,
title={Findings of the WMT 2024 Shared Task on Chat Translation},
author={Mohammed et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2410.11624}
}
```
- arXiv: 2410.11624
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!