Skip to content
Back to skills

Wmt2024 Discourse Literary Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates document-level and literary-domain machine translation quality, focusing on discourse-aware metrics like consistency, anaphora resolution, and term consistency across long-form Chinese web novels. The protocol combines automated n-gram and neural metrics with a structured human judgment framework to capture cross-sentence coherence and literary style. Use when the user wants to benchmark on WMT 2024 Discourse-Level Literary Translation Shared Task, or asks about evaluating this task...

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythongit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill wmt2024-discourse-literary-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Wmt2024 Discourse Literary Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Wmt2024 Discourse Literary Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-wmt2024-discourse-literary-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-wmt2024-discourse-literary-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: wmt2024-discourse-literary-eval
description: Evaluates document-level and literary-domain machine translation quality, focusing on discourse-aware metrics like consistency, anaphora resolution, and term consistency across long-form Chinese web novels. The protocol combines automated n-gram and neural metrics with a structured human judgment framework to capture cross-sentence coherence and literary style. Use when the user wants to benchmark on WMT 2024 Discourse-Level Literary Translation Shared Task, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports d-BLEU.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2412.11732
  bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
  confidence: high
---

# wmt2024-discourse-literary-eval

> Findings of the WMT 2024 Shared Task on Discourse-Level Literary Translation — Wang et al. (2024) (arXiv:2412.11732, 2024)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates document-level and literary-domain machine translation quality, focusing on discourse-aware metrics like consistency, anaphora resolution, and term consistency across long-form Chinese web novels. The protocol combines automated n-gram and neural metrics with a structured human judgment framework to capture cross-sentence coherence and literary style.

## Datasets

- **WMT 2024 Discourse-Level Literary Translation Shared Task** — total ?; splits: test (-1); repo https://github.com/longyuewangdcu/GuoFeng-Webnovel

## Metrics

- `d-BLEU` **(primary)** — range: [0, 100]
  - Document-level sacreBLEU calculated by concatenating all sentences in a document into a single line and computing n-gram matches case-sensitively using sacrebleu tool with signature nrefs:2|case:mixed|eff:no|tok:13a|smooth:exp|version:2.3.1.
- `Human Quality Score` — range: [0, 5]
  - 0–5 scale assessing general quality (fluency, adequacy) and discourse-aware quality (consistency, word choice, anaphora). Scores are averaged across two professional evaluators.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Source Chinese document (concatenated sentences for automated metrics) or window of neighboring sentences with document context for human evaluation.

**Output**: Translated target language document (German, Russian, or English).

## Scoring recipe

```python
def score_d_bleu(hypothesis_sentences, reference_sentences):
    doc_hyp = ' '.join(hypothesis_sentences)
    doc_ref = ' '.join(reference_sentences)
    return sacrebleu.corpus_bleu(doc_hyp, [doc_ref], tokenize='13a', case_mixed=True).score

def score_human(hyp_text, ref_text, context):
    # Evaluators assign 0-5 based on rubric for general & discourse quality
    score_1 = evaluate(hyp_text, ref_text, context, evaluator=1)
    score_2 = evaluate(hyp_text, ref_text, context, evaluator=2)
    return (score_1 + score_2) / 2
```

## Common pitfalls

- d-BLEU requires concatenating all sentences into a single line before scoring, unlike standard sentence-level BLEU.
- Human evaluation uses a 0-5 scale for two distinct dimensions (general quality and discourse-aware quality), not a single MQM score.
- Automatic metrics show significant discrepancies with human judgments, especially for discourse properties like anaphora and consistency.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> For document-level evaluation, we employ document-level sacreBLEU (d-BLEU) Liu et al. ([2020]), which assesses n-gram matches across complete documents. This involves concatenating all sentences in a document into a single line before applying the sacreBLEU metric. Evaluations are conducted in a case-sensitive manner. We establish two sets of evaluation criteria: 1) general quality, covering aspects such as fluency and adequacy; 2) discourse-aware quality, including factors such as consistency, word choice, and anaphora. The detailed scoring criteria are listed in Table[6]. Accordingly, each output will be assigned two distinct scores (0∼5).

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{wang2024wmt2024discourse,
  title={Findings of the WMT 2024 Shared Task on Discourse-Level Literary Translation},
  author={Wang et al. (2024)},
  year={2024},
  note={arXiv:2412.11732}
}
```

- arXiv: 2412.11732

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.