Evaluates the ability of models to correctly identify the language of monolingual text paragraphs. It probes language identification capabilities across a wide range of languages (235) with balanced representation. Use when the user wants to benchmark on WiLI-2018, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill wili-2018-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Wili 2018 Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-wili-2018-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: wili-2018-eval
description: Evaluates the ability of models to correctly identify the language of monolingual text paragraphs. It probes language identification capabilities across a wide range of languages (235) with balanced representation. Use when the user wants to benchmark on WiLI-2018, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 1801.07779
bibtex_key: thoma2018wili
confidence: high
---
# wili-2018-eval
> The WiLI benchmark dataset for written language identification — Thoma (2018) (arXiv:1801.07779, 2018)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the ability of models to correctly identify the language of monolingual text paragraphs. It probes language identification capabilities across a wide range of languages (235) with balanced representation.
## Datasets
- **WiLI-2018** — total 1000; splits: test (1000)
## Metrics
- `F1` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Standard classification F1 score, calculated per language and averaged (typically micro-averaged for the overall benchmark score). Precision = TP/(TP+FP), Recall = TP/(TP+FN), F1 = 2*P*R/(P+R).
## Input / output format
**Input**: A monolingual text paragraph (approximately 1,000 tokens).
**Output**: A single ISO 639-3 language code (or Wikipedia-specific code for some languages).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_f1(predictions, gold):
correct = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold) if p == g)
return correct / len(predictions)
```
## Common pitfalls
- The dataset uses some non-standard or Wikipedia-specific language codes (e.g., 'map-bms', 'lzh') that may not match standard ISO 639-3 lists.
- Text is pre-normalized to Unicode NFKC form, so models must handle normalization or the benchmark assumes it.
- Results are reported per-language; overall performance should be micro-averaged across all 235 languages.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Lang Prec Recall F1 Lang Prec Recall F1
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{thoma2018wili,
title={The WiLI benchmark dataset for written language identification},
author={Thoma (2018)},
year={2018},
note={arXiv:1801.07779}
}
```
- arXiv: 1801.07779
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!