Evaluates the robustness and accuracy of TinyML person detection models across diverse demographic, environmental, and visual conditions. It benchmarks binary classification performance on large-scale, real-world image datasets tailored for resource-constrained devices. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Wake Vision, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Wake Vision Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-wake-vision-eval)
---
name: wake-vision-eval
description: Evaluates the robustness and accuracy of TinyML person detection models across diverse demographic, environmental, and visual conditions. It benchmarks binary classification performance on large-scale, real-world image datasets tailored for resource-constrained devices. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Wake Vision, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2405.00892
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: high
---
# wake-vision-eval
> Wake Vision: A Tailored Dataset and Benchmark Suite for TinyML Computer Vision Applications — Banbury et al. (2024) (arXiv:2405.00892, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the robustness and accuracy of TinyML person detection models across diverse demographic, environmental, and visual conditions. It benchmarks binary classification performance on large-scale, real-world image datasets tailored for resource-constrained devices.
## Datasets
- **Wake Vision** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Top-level test accuracy calculated as the percentage of correctly classified binary labels on the held-out test set.
- `F1 score` — range: [0, 1]
- Harmonic mean of precision and recall, computed per fine-grained subgroup (e.g., age, lighting, distance) and averaged across three models per dataset.
## Input / output format
**Input**: 224x224x3 RGB images representing real-world scenes for binary person detection.
**Output**: Binary classification label (person vs. non-person/wake word).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_accuracy(preds, gold):
return sum(p == g for p, g in zip(preds, gold)) / len(gold) * 100
def compute_f1(preds, gold):
tp = sum(p == 1 and g == 1 for p, g in zip(preds, gold))
fp = sum(p == 1 and g == 0 for p, g in zip(preds, gold))
fn = sum(p == 0 and g == 1 for p, g in zip(preds, gold))
prec = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) > 0 else 0
rec = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) > 0 else 0
return 2 * prec * rec / (prec + rec) if (prec + rec) > 0 else 0
```
## Common pitfalls
- Models trained on VWW may outperform Wake Vision models on the VWW test set due to domain shift, not superior generalization.
- Fine-grained F1 scores are averaged across three models per dataset, not reported per individual model.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The Wake Vision model exhibits superior robustness across the challenging settings exercised by our benchmarking suite. For instance, on the “Depictions” benchmark, which evaluates performance on images containing persons, non-person objects, or no depictions, the Wake Vision model achieves an F1 score of 0.71 for person depictions, outperforming the VWW model’s 0.66.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{banbury2024wakevision,
title={Wake Vision: A Tailored Dataset and Benchmark Suite for TinyML Computer Vision Applications},
author={Banbury et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2405.00892}
}
```
- arXiv: 2405.00892