This evaluation probes a full-stream text-to-speech model's ability to generate intelligible, natural-sounding speech while dynamically controlling the speaking rate in real-time. It measures objective intelligibility, speaker similarity, audio quality, generation latency, and the accuracy of speaking-rate control against target rates. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Emilia speaking-rate dataset, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WER (%).
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill voxtream2-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Voxtream2 Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-voxtream2-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: voxtream2-eval
description: This evaluation probes a full-stream text-to-speech model's ability to generate intelligible, natural-sounding speech while dynamically controlling the speaking rate in real-time. It measures objective intelligibility, speaker similarity, audio quality, generation latency, and the accuracy of speaking-rate control against target rates. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Emilia speaking-rate dataset, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WER (%).
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2603.13518
bibtex_key: torgashov2026voxstream2
confidence: high
---
# voxtream2-eval
> VoXtream2: Full-stream TTS with dynamic speaking rate control — Torgashov et al. (2026) (arXiv:2603.13518, 2026)
## What this evaluates
This evaluation probes a full-stream text-to-speech model's ability to generate intelligible, natural-sounding speech while dynamically controlling the speaking rate in real-time. It measures objective intelligibility, speaker similarity, audio quality, generation latency, and the accuracy of speaking-rate control against target rates.
## Datasets
- **Emilia speaking-rate dataset** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `WER (%)` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Word Error Rate calculated as the percentage of incorrectly transcribed words relative to the ground truth text.
- `SPK-SIM` — range: [0, 1]
- Speaker Similarity score computed as the cosine similarity between speaker embeddings of the generated audio and the reference acoustic prompt.
- `UTMOS` — range: other
- Universal TTS Mean Opinion Score, an objective predictor of perceived audio quality and naturalness.
- `FPL (ms)` — range: ms
- First Packet Latency, measuring the time elapsed from input submission to the generation of the first audio packet.
- `RTF` — range: [0, 1]
- Real-Time Factor, calculated as the ratio of total generated audio duration to the total inference time.
- `Corr.` — range: [0, 1]
- Pearson correlation coefficient between the target speaking rate (SPS) control signal and the actual synthesized speaking rate extracted via phoneme alignment.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Text input, acoustic prompt (reference speech), and target speaking rate or control signal (e.g., SPS value or linearly varying signal).
**Output**: Synthesized audio waveform.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(audio, text, prompt_audio, target_sps, control_signal):
wer = wer_engine(transcribe(audio), text)
spk_sim = cosine_similarity(speaker_encoder(audio), speaker_encoder(prompt_audio))
utmos = utmos_model(audio)
fpl = time_to_first_packet()
rtf = len(audio) / inference_time()
target_rates = extract_sps(control_signal)
gen_rates = extract_sps_from_alignments(audio)
corr = pearsonr(target_rates, gen_rates)
return {'WER': wer, 'SPK-SIM': spk_sim, 'UTMOS': utmos, 'FPL': fpl, 'RTF': rtf, 'Corr.': corr}
```
## Common pitfalls
- WER can be artificially inflated at slow speaking rates due to model-generated fillers and word repetitions, which sound natural but penalize transcription accuracy.
- SPK-SIM and UTMOS are not reported for the full-stream setting because they showed no significant difference compared to non-streaming evaluation.
- Spark-TTS is excluded from speaker similarity (SPK-SIM) evaluation because its controllable version does not support voice cloning.
- UTMOS ratings are sensitive to evaluation design and may reflect overall audio quality or background noise rather than strictly naturalness.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We benchmark the performance of our model against prior work in Table 4. VoXtream2 achieves the lowest FPL and RTF among publicly available full-stream models. We also evaluate different GPU inference optimizations. While torch.compile provides the best runtime performance, it requires longer graph compilation time compared to CUDA Graphs.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{torgashov2026voxstream2,
title={VoXtream2: Full-stream TTS with dynamic speaking rate control},
author={Torgashov et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2603.13518}
}
```
- arXiv: 2603.13518
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!