Evaluates the ability of vision-language models to understand long videos using a training-free visual prompting strategy that combines consecutive frames into multi-frame 'panels'. It probes temporal reasoning, needle-in-a-haystack retrieval, and question-answering capabilities under varying context window constraints. Use when the user wants to benchmark on VideoMME, TimeScope, MLVU, MF2, VNBench, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Video Panels Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-video-panels-eval)
---
name: video-panels-eval
description: Evaluates the ability of vision-language models to understand long videos using a training-free visual prompting strategy that combines consecutive frames into multi-frame 'panels'. It probes temporal reasoning, needle-in-a-haystack retrieval, and question-answering capabilities under varying context window constraints. Use when the user wants to benchmark on VideoMME, TimeScope, MLVU, MF2, VNBench, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2509.23724
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: high
---
# video-panels-eval
> Video Panels for Long Video Understanding — Doorenbos et al. (2025) (arXiv:2509.23724, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the ability of vision-language models to understand long videos using a training-free visual prompting strategy that combines consecutive frames into multi-frame 'panels'. It probes temporal reasoning, needle-in-a-haystack retrieval, and question-answering capabilities under varying context window constraints.
## Datasets
- **VideoMME** — total ?; splits: short (-1), medium (-1), long (-1)
- **TimeScope** — total 1950; splits: short (1500), long (450)
- **MLVU** — total 2593; splits: dev (2593)
- **MF2** — total 850; splits: (unstated)
- **VNBench** — total 5400; splits: (unstated)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly answered questions out of the total number of questions in the benchmark split.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Multi-frame images (panels) created by combining consecutive video frames, accompanied by the question and multiple-choice options formatted as expected by the VLM.
**Output**: A single uppercase letter corresponding to the correct option (e.g., 'A', 'B', 'C', 'D'), as instructed by 'Answer with the option’s letter from the given choices directly.'
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_accuracy(predictions, gold_labels):
correct = 0
for pred, gold in zip(predictions, gold_labels):
if pred.strip().upper() == gold.strip().upper():
correct += 1
return (correct / len(gold_labels)) * 100
```
## Common pitfalls
- Paneling reduces spatial resolution to increase temporal coverage, which can hurt performance on tasks requiring fine-grained visual details.
- The gamma hyperparameter triggers paneling based on video FPS; applying a fixed gamma across datasets with different frame rates may cause suboptimal performance on short videos.
- Models often output full sentences or explanations instead of the required single-letter answer, necessitating strict prompt adherence or post-processing to match the evaluation format.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We report the accuracy over all the questions for each benchmark.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{doorenbos2025videopanelslongvideo,
title={Video Panels for Long Video Understanding},
author={Doorenbos et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2509.23724}
}
```
- arXiv: 2509.23724