Evaluates a unified multimodal model's ability to generate synchronized audio and video from text, phonemes, and reference media. It probes zero-shot voice cloning fidelity, lip-sync accuracy, acoustic quality, and cross-modal temporal alignment. Use when the user wants to benchmark on VerseBench, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WER.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill versebench-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Versebench Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-versebench-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: versebench-eval
description: Evaluates a unified multimodal model's ability to generate synchronized audio and video from text, phonemes, and reference media. It probes zero-shot voice cloning fidelity, lip-sync accuracy, acoustic quality, and cross-modal temporal alignment. Use when the user wants to benchmark on VerseBench, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WER.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2601.01568
bibtex_key: qiang2026mmsonate
confidence: high
---
# versebench-eval
> MM-Sonate: Multimodal Controllable Audio-Video Generation with Zero-Shot Voice Cloning — Qiang et al. (2026) (arXiv:2601.01568, 2026)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates a unified multimodal model's ability to generate synchronized audio and video from text, phonemes, and reference media. It probes zero-shot voice cloning fidelity, lip-sync accuracy, acoustic quality, and cross-modal temporal alignment.
## Datasets
- **VerseBench** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `WER` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Word Error Rate computed by transcribing generated audio with Whisper-large-v3 and comparing against ground-truth text.
- `SIM-o` — range: [0, 1]
- Speaker similarity score calculated using the WavLM-large speaker verification model following the SeedTTS protocol.
- `SNC` — range: other
- SyncNet Confidence score measuring lip-synchronization quality between generated audio and video frames.
- `CLAP` — range: [0, 1]
- Semantic alignment score between audio and text using the CLAP model.
- `FD` — range: other
- Fréchet Distance on mel-spectrogram features extracted via PANNs, measuring distributional distance.
- `AS` — range: [0, 1]
- Aesthetic Score derived from MANIQA, aesthetic-predictor-v2-5, and Musiq.
- `MS` — range: [0, 1]
- Motion Score based on RAFT optical flow to quantify dynamic realism.
- `ID` — range: [0, 1]
- Identity Consistency measured as mean DINOV3 feature similarity between reference and generated frames.
- `AV-A` — range: other
- Audio-Video Alignment distance computed via Synchformer.
- `IB` — range: [0, 1]
- ImageBind score measuring global cross-modal alignment.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Text instructions, phoneme sequences, and optionally reference audio (for timbre cloning) and reference images (for animation).
**Output**: Synchronized video frames and corresponding audio waveform.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(predictions, gold):
wer = whisper_transcribe(predictions.audio).wer(gold.text)
sim_o = wavlm_similarity(predictions.audio, gold.ref_audio)
snc = syncnet_confidence(predictions.audio, predictions.video)
clap = clap_score(predictions.audio, gold.text)
fd = frechet_distance(melspectrogram(predictions.audio), melspectrogram(gold.audio))
return {'WER': wer, 'SIM-o': sim_o, 'SNC': snc, 'CLAP': clap, 'FD': fd}
```
## Common pitfalls
- Comparing joint audio-video generation models against audio-only TTS baselines without acknowledging the increased generative complexity of the multimodal task.
- Using different speaker verification backends (WavLM-large for SIM-o vs. Resemblyzer for ablation studies), which prevents direct numerical comparison of identity preservation scores across tables.
- Relying solely on automated metrics for lip-sync and identity, as the paper also supplements these with human preference tests and pass-rate thresholds.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Speech intelligibility is quantified by the Word Error Rate (WER), derived from Whisper-large-v3 transcriptions. To assess speaker identity preservation, we employ specific metrics depending on the evaluation context. For the main comparative benchmark against state-of-the-art TTS models (Table[2]), we follow the SeedTTS evaluation protocol and report SIM-o, calculated using the WavLM-large speaker verification model.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{qiang2026mmsonate,
title={MM-Sonate: Multimodal Controllable Audio-Video Generation with Zero-Shot Voice Cloning},
author={Qiang et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2601.01568}
}
```
- arXiv: 2601.01568
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!