Evaluates text-to-video generation quality and semantic alignment across dimensions like human action, scene composition, object consistency, and aesthetic quality. Use when the user wants to benchmark on VBench, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports VBench Overall.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill vbench-t2v --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Vbench T2v?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-vbench-t2v)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: vbench-t2v
description: Evaluates text-to-video generation quality and semantic alignment across dimensions like human action, scene composition, object consistency, and aesthetic quality. Use when the user wants to benchmark on VBench, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports VBench Overall.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2604.13030
bibtex_key: han2026generativerefinement
confidence: high
---
# vbench-t2v
> Generative Refinement Networks for Visual Synthesis — Jian Han et al. (arXiv:2604.13030, 2026)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates text-to-video generation quality and semantic alignment across dimensions like human action, scene composition, object consistency, and aesthetic quality.
## Datasets
- **VBench** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `VBench Overall` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Composite score aggregating Human Action, Scene, Multiple Objects, Appearance Style, Quality Score, and Semantic Score. Reported as percentage.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Text prompt describing video content
**Output**: Video clip (2-10 seconds, 256x256 to 480p)
## Scoring recipe
```python
videos = []
for prompt in vbench_prompts:
videos.append(model.generate(prompt))
scores = vbench.evaluate(videos)
overall = mean(scores.dimensions)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Scores are computed on videos generated after prompt rewriting.
- Automated VBench metrics may not fully capture temporal coherence or human preference.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> GRN exhibits superior performance in generating videos from textual prompts. When benchmarked against contemporary diffusion and flow-based models—including AnimateDiff-V2 *[animatediff]*, VideoCraft-2.0 *[videocrafter]*, OpenSora V1.2 *[opensora]*, Show-1 *[show-1]*, and CogVideoX-5B *[cogvideox]*—GRN achieves significantly higher scores across quality, semantic, and overall scores.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{han2026generativerefinement,
title={Generative Refinement Networks for Visual Synthesis},
author={Jian Han et al.},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2604.13030}
}
```
- arXiv: 2604.13030
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!