Probes an object detector's ability to localize and classify instances across a vast, hierarchical vocabulary of over 13,000 categories. It evaluates both closed-set detection performance and open-vocabulary generalization to novel, unseen categories. Use when the user wants to benchmark on V3Det, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AP.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of V3det Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-v3det-eval)
---
name: v3det-eval
description: Probes an object detector's ability to localize and classify instances across a vast, hierarchical vocabulary of over 13,000 categories. It evaluates both closed-set detection performance and open-vocabulary generalization to novel, unseen categories. Use when the user wants to benchmark on V3Det, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AP.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2304.03752
bibtex_key: wang2023v3det
confidence: high
---
# v3det-eval
> V3Det: Vast Vocabulary Visual Detection Dataset — Jiaqi Wang et al. (2023) (arXiv:2304.03752, 2023)
## What this evaluates
Probes an object detector's ability to localize and classify instances across a vast, hierarchical vocabulary of over 13,000 categories. It evaluates both closed-set detection performance and open-vocabulary generalization to novel, unseen categories.
## Datasets
- **V3Det** — total 243038; splits: train (183354), val (29821), test (29863)
## Metrics
- `AP` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Mean Average Precision computed across IoU thresholds from 0.5 to 0.95, following the COCO evaluation protocol. It averages the AP at each IoU threshold.
## Input / output format
**Input**: RGB image with associated ground-truth bounding boxes and category labels. For open-vocabulary evaluation, text descriptions of base and novel categories are also provided.
**Output**: List of predicted bounding boxes, each containing a class label, confidence score, and bounding box coordinates (x, y, width, height).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_ap(predictions, ground_truth, iou_thresh=0.5):
predictions = sorted(predictions, key=lambda x: x['score'], reverse=True)
tp, fp = [], []
for pred in predictions:
gt_match = find_best_match(pred, ground_truth, iou_thresh)
if gt_match and not gt_match['used']:
tp.append(1); gt_match['used'] = True
else:
fp.append(1)
tp_cum = np.cumsum(tp)
fp_cum = np.cumsum(fp)
precision = tp_cum / (tp_cum + fp_cum + 1e-8)
recall = tp_cum / (len(ground_truth) + 1e-8)
return compute_ap_from_curve(precision, recall)
# Final AP is mean of AP across IoU thresholds 0.50:0.05:0.95
```
## Common pitfalls
- The test split images are not publicly released; researchers must upload predictions to a designated public test server for evaluation.
- Open-vocabulary benchmarks require strict separation of base ($C_{base}$) and novel ($C_{novel}$) classes, reporting $bAP$ and $nAP$ separately rather than a single aggregate score.
- The dataset contains 13,204 categories with hierarchical inclusion relationships, so standard flat-category detectors may struggle without specific adaptations like the Norm Linear Layer or repeat factor sampler.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We follow the evaluation metrics of the COCO dataset to report the mean average precise (AP) on different IoU thresholds (i.e., 0.5 ~ 0.95).
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{wang2023v3det,
title={V3Det: Vast Vocabulary Visual Detection Dataset},
author={Jiaqi Wang et al. (2023)},
year={2023},
note={arXiv:2304.03752}
}
```
- arXiv: 2304.03752