Evaluates a multi-modal LLM's ability to fuse 3D perception features from multiple connected vehicles to answer safety-critical driving queries. It probes spatial grounding, notable object identification near planned waypoints, and collision-avoidance trajectory planning in cooperative autonomous driving scenarios. Use when the user wants to benchmark on V2V-QA, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill v2v-qa-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of V2v Qa Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-v2v-qa-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: v2v-qa-eval
description: Evaluates a multi-modal LLM's ability to fuse 3D perception features from multiple connected vehicles to answer safety-critical driving queries. It probes spatial grounding, notable object identification near planned waypoints, and collision-avoidance trajectory planning in cooperative autonomous driving scenarios. Use when the user wants to benchmark on V2V-QA, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2502.09980
bibtex_key: chiu2025v2vllm
confidence: high
---
# v2v-qa-eval
> V2V-LLM: Vehicle-to-Vehicle Cooperative Autonomous Driving with Multi-Modal Large Language Models — Chiu et al. (2025) (arXiv:2502.09980, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates a multi-modal LLM's ability to fuse 3D perception features from multiple connected vehicles to answer safety-critical driving queries. It probes spatial grounding, notable object identification near planned waypoints, and collision-avoidance trajectory planning in cooperative autonomous driving scenarios.
## Datasets
- **V2V-QA** — total ?; splits: V2V-split (-1), V2X-split (-1)
## Metrics
- `F1` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Harmonic mean of precision and recall for spatial grounding and object identification tasks. Computed per question type (Q1-Q4) and averaged for QGr.
- `L2 distance error` — range: other
- Euclidean distance between predicted future trajectory waypoints and ground-truth trajectory waypoints, measured in meters.
- `Collision rate` — range: percent
- Percentage of generated planning trajectories that result in a collision with nearby objects or obstacles.
- `Communication cost` — range: other
- Total data transferred per timestep between CAVs and the centralized LLM node, calculated as (0.203 + 0.0004 * N_q) MB per CAV, where N_q is the number of questions.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Scene-level feature maps and object-level feature vectors extracted from LiDAR point clouds of multiple connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs), combined with a natural language question specifying grounding references, object identification targets, or planning waypoints.
**Output**: Natural language response containing predicted spatial coordinates for grounding, identified notable objects, and future driving trajectory waypoints.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(predictions, gold):
# Grounding & Identification (Q1-Q4)
f1_scores = []
for pred_locs, gold_locs in zip(predictions, gold):
tp = count_spatial_matches(pred_locs, gold_locs, threshold=0.5)
prec = tp / (len(pred_locs) + 1e-8)
rec = tp / (len(gold_locs) + 1e-8)
f1_scores.append(2 * prec * rec / (prec + rec + 1e-8))
f1 = mean(f1_scores)
# Planning (Q5)
l2_errors = [np.linalg.norm(p - g) for p, g in zip(predictions, gold)]
l2 = mean(l2_errors)
cr = count_collisions(predictions) / len(predictions)
return {'F1': f1, 'L2': l2, 'CR': cr}
```
## Common pitfalls
- F1 scores for grounding tasks rely on implicit spatial matching thresholds not explicitly defined in the main text, making exact replication difficult without supplementary code.
- Planning metrics (L2 distance and collision rate) require specific trajectory alignment and collision detection logic that varies across implementations.
- Communication cost scales non-linearly with the number of vehicles (N_v) and questions (N_q), so direct comparisons are sensitive to these hyperparameters rather than reflecting pure model efficiency.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Q1: Grounding at a reference location. Q2: Grounding behind a reference object at a location. Q3: Grounding behind a reference object in a direction. QGr: Average of grounding (Q1, Q2, and Q3). Q4: Notable object identification. Q5: Planning. L2: L2 distance error. CR: Collision rate.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{chiu2025v2vllm,
title={V2V-LLM: Vehicle-to-Vehicle Cooperative Autonomous Driving with Multi-Modal Large Language Models},
author={Chiu et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2502.09980}
}
```
- arXiv: 2502.09980
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!