Evaluates text-to-SQL models on compositional generalization, out-of-domain robustness, and schema-question alignment across 18 diverse datasets and 12 domains. It probes the model's ability to handle long-form query decomposition and cross-domain SQL pattern diversity. Use when the user wants to benchmark on UNITE, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill unite-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Unite Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-unite-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: unite-eval
description: Evaluates text-to-SQL models on compositional generalization, out-of-domain robustness, and schema-question alignment across 18 diverse datasets and 12 domains. It probes the model's ability to handle long-form query decomposition and cross-domain SQL pattern diversity. Use when the user wants to benchmark on UNITE, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2305.16265
bibtex_key: lan2023unite
confidence: high
---
# unite-eval
> UNITE: A Unified Benchmark for Text-to-SQL Evaluation — Lan et al. (2023) (arXiv:2305.16265, 2023)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates text-to-SQL models on compositional generalization, out-of-domain robustness, and schema-question alignment across 18 diverse datasets and 12 domains. It probes the model's ability to handle long-form query decomposition and cross-domain SQL pattern diversity.
## Datasets
- **UNITE** — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Execution accuracy: the predicted SQL query is executed on the target database, and the output is compared against the gold execution result. A prediction is correct only if the execution results match exactly.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Natural language question paired with the corresponding database schema.
**Output**: A single SQL query string.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_accuracy(predictions, golds, databases):
correct = 0
for pred_sql, gold_sql, db in zip(predictions, golds, databases):
pred_result = execute_sql(pred_sql, db)
gold_result = execute_sql(gold_sql, db)
if pred_result == gold_result:
correct += 1
return correct / len(predictions)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Prompt engineering and exemplar selection heavily influence in-context learning performance on out-of-domain data.
- Spider benchmark accuracy is a poor proxy for real-world application robustness.
- Constrained decoding is essential for generalizing to novel SQL structures and avoiding illegal generations.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We report zero-shot and 3-shot performance for Codex, by following prompt design in Rajkumar et al. (2022). For other fine-tuning based models, we report performance with the original public checkpoints trained on Spider dataset. We also re-train T5-3B and RASAT with our UNITE training set... Our main results are shown in Table 2. Firstly, these SOTA models have performance level 70% ~ 80% for Spider, but below 50% on our UNITE benchmark on average.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{lan2023unite,
title={UNITE: A Unified Benchmark for Text-to-SQL Evaluation},
author={Lan et al. (2023)},
year={2023},
note={arXiv:2305.16265}
}
```
- arXiv: 2305.16265

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!