Evaluates information retrieval systems on pandemic-related queries using a dynamically evolving corpus. It probes a system's ability to retrieve relevant medical literature under real-world conditions where terminology and document availability change rapidly. Use when the user wants to benchmark on TREC-COVID Round 1, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports NDCG@10.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill trec-covid-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Trec Covid Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-trec-covid-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: trec-covid-eval
description: Evaluates information retrieval systems on pandemic-related queries using a dynamically evolving corpus. It probes a system's ability to retrieve relevant medical literature under real-world conditions where terminology and document availability change rapidly. Use when the user wants to benchmark on TREC-COVID Round 1, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports NDCG@10.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2005.04474
bibtex_key: voorhees2020trecovid
confidence: high
---
# trec-covid-eval
> TREC-COVID: Constructing a Pandemic Information Retrieval Test Collection — Voorhees et al. (2020) (arXiv:2005.04474, 2020)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates information retrieval systems on pandemic-related queries using a dynamically evolving corpus. It probes a system's ability to retrieve relevant medical literature under real-world conditions where terminology and document availability change rapidly.
## Datasets
- **TREC-COVID Round 1** — total ?; splits: test (30)
## Metrics
- `NDCG@10` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain at rank 10. It measures the quality of a ranked list by comparing it to an ideal graded relevance ranking, discounting gains logarithmically by position and normalizing by the ideal DCG.
## Input / output format
**Input**: A topic description (query) and a ranked list of candidate documents retrieved by the system.
**Output**: A ranked list of document IDs ordered by predicted relevance.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_ndcg_at_10(relevance_scores, k=10):
dcg = sum(rel / math.log2(i + 2) for i, rel in enumerate(relevance_scores[:k]))
ideal = sorted(relevance_scores, reverse=True)
idcg = sum(rel / math.log2(i + 2) for i, rel in enumerate(ideal[:k]))
return dcg / idcg if idcg > 0 else 0.0
# Map 'Partially Relevant' to 1, 'Relevant' to 2, unjudged/other to 0
```
## Common pitfalls
- Relevance is graded ('Partially Relevant' vs 'Relevant'), not binary; treating all judged documents as binary relevant/non-relevant will distort NDCG scores.
- Depth-7 priority-based pooling means unjudged documents are not guaranteed to be non-relevant, violating the standard assumption required for unbiased estimation of some IR metrics.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Figure 5 provides a view of how effective the participants' systems were as a group. The figure contains a box-and-whiskers plot of the NDCG@10 scores across all 143 submitted runs for each topic.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{voorhees2020trecovid,
title={TREC-COVID: Constructing a Pandemic Information Retrieval Test Collection},
author={Voorhees et al. (2020)},
year={2020},
note={arXiv:2005.04474}
}
```
- arXiv: 2005.04474

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!