Predicts the sentiment polarity associated with a specific topic within a tweet, requiring topic-aware sentiment classification and contextual disambiguation. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Twitter2015-test, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports macro-averaged F1.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill topic-level-polarity-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Topic Level Polarity Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-topic-level-polarity-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: topic-level-polarity-eval
description: Predicts the sentiment polarity associated with a specific topic within a tweet, requiring topic-aware sentiment classification and contextual disambiguation. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Twitter2015-test, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports macro-averaged F1.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 1912.02387
bibtex_key: rosenthal2015semeval
confidence: high
---
# topic-level-polarity-eval
> SemEval-2015 Task 10: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter — Rosenthal et al. (2015) (SemEval-2015 / arXiv:1912.02387, 2015)
## What this evaluates
Predicts the sentiment polarity associated with a specific topic within a tweet, requiring topic-aware sentiment classification and contextual disambiguation.
## Datasets
- **Twitter2015-test** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `macro-averaged F1` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Harmonic mean of precision and recall averaged across all classes (positive, negative, neutral).
## Input / output format
**Input**: A tweet along with a target topic label.
**Output**: Sentiment polarity label for the specified topic.
## Scoring recipe
```python
prec = rec = 0
for class in ['pos', 'neg', 'neu']:
prec += precision(y_true, y_pred, class)
rec += recall(y_true, y_pred, class)
macro_prec = prec / 3
macro_rec = rec / 3
f1 = 2 * (macro_prec * macro_rec) / (macro_prec + macro_rec)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Subtask C is significantly harder than B; top teams score 41-51 F1 vs 64-65 for B, despite similar class distributions.
- Performance drop is due to task complexity (topic-awareness), not class imbalance, as baseline F1 is similar (26.7% vs 30.3%).
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The results for subtask C are shown in Table 12. ... achieved an F1 of 50.51, KLUEless with F1 = 45.48, and Whu-Nlp with F1 = 40.70
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{rosenthal2015semeval,
title={SemEval-2015 Task 10: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter},
author={Rosenthal et al. (2015)},
year={2015},
note={SemEval-2015 / arXiv:1912.02387}
}
```
- arXiv: 1912.02387
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!