Evaluates large language models' domain-specific knowledge in telecommunications, covering general terminology, research concepts, and complex technical standards. It also benchmarks model performance against human telecom professionals under strict no-search conditions. Use when the user wants to benchmark on TeleQnA, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Teleqna Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-teleqna-eval)
---
name: teleqna-eval
description: Evaluates large language models' domain-specific knowledge in telecommunications, covering general terminology, research concepts, and complex technical standards. It also benchmarks model performance against human telecom professionals under strict no-search conditions. Use when the user wants to benchmark on TeleQnA, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2310.15051
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: high
---
# teleqna-eval
> TeleQnA: A Benchmark Dataset to Assess Large Language Models Telecommunications Knowledge — Maatouk et al. (2023) (arXiv:2310.15051, 2023)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates large language models' domain-specific knowledge in telecommunications, covering general terminology, research concepts, and complex technical standards. It also benchmarks model performance against human telecom professionals under strict no-search conditions.
## Datasets
- **TeleQnA** — total 10000; splits: test (10000); repo https://github.com/netop-team/TeleQnA
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of questions for which the model selected the option marked as correct in the dataset. Calculated as (number of correct predictions / total number of questions) * 100.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Multiple-choice questions with predefined options. In context-augmented experiments, questions are paired with the top-3 most similar 500-word segments from technical standards documents based on embedding similarity.
**Output**: The model must select exactly one option from the provided choices for each question.
## Scoring recipe
```python
correct = 0
for q, options, gold_idx in dataset:
pred_idx = model.predict(q, options)
if pred_idx == gold_idx:
correct += 1
accuracy = (correct / len(dataset)) * 100
```
## Common pitfalls
- Querying questions in large batches (e.g., B=50) reduces accuracy compared to single questions due to increased topic diversity and context dilution.
- Performance heavily depends on providing external context; without top-3 relevant document segments, accuracy on standards questions drops significantly.
- Human baseline requires strict enforcement of a no-search/no-external-reference policy to ensure a fair comparison.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> As a performance measure, we define the accuracy as the percentage of questions for which the entity at hand selected the option marked as correct in the dataset.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{maatouk2023teleqna,
title={TeleQnA: A Benchmark Dataset to Assess Large Language Models Telecommunications Knowledge},
author={Maatouk et al. (2023)},
year={2023},
note={arXiv:2310.15051}
}
```
- arXiv: 2310.15051