Assesses pharmacological property prediction across ADME, PK, and toxicity tasks, including regression, classification, and correlation-based evaluation. Use when the user wants to benchmark on TDC Benchmark, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AUROC / AUPRC.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill tdc-adme-pk-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Tdc Adme Pk Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-tdc-adme-pk-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: tdc-adme-pk-eval
description: Assesses pharmacological property prediction across ADME, PK, and toxicity tasks, including regression, classification, and correlation-based evaluation. Use when the user wants to benchmark on TDC Benchmark, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AUROC / AUPRC.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2603.03517
bibtex_key: kuznetsov2026mmai
confidence: high
---
# tdc-adme-pk-eval
> MMAI Gym for Science: Training Liquid Foundation Models for Drug Discovery — Kuznetsov et al. (2026) (arXiv:2603.03517, 2026)
## What this evaluates
Assesses pharmacological property prediction across ADME, PK, and toxicity tasks, including regression, classification, and correlation-based evaluation.
## Datasets
- **TDC Benchmark** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `MAE` — range: other
- Mean Absolute Error for regression tasks (e.g., Caco2 permeability, HIA).
- `Spearman's Correlation` — range: [-1, 1]
- Spearman rank correlation coefficient for pharmacokinetics tasks.
- `AUROC / AUPRC` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic / Precision-Recall Curve for classification tasks (e.g., BBB penetration, hERG inhibition).
## Input / output format
**Input**: Molecular input (SMILES/structure) with task-specific instruction prompt.
**Output**: Chain-of-thought reasoning in <think> tags, followed by an <answer> block containing a numeric value or class label.
## Scoring recipe
```python
preds = []
for rep in range(num_reps):
out = model.generate(prompt(), mol)
preds.append(parse_answer(out))
final = median(preds) if regression else mode(preds)
if task_type == 'regression':
mae = mean(abs(p - g) for p, g in zip(final, gold))
elif task_type == 'pk':
spearman = rank_correlation(final, gold)
else:
auroc = roc_auc_score(gold, class_probs)
auprc = pr_auc_score(gold, class_probs)
```
## Common pitfalls
- TDC tasks have strict data splits and preprocessing pipelines; deviating from the standard protocol invalidates comparisons.
- Class probabilities must be extracted from first-token logprobs via softmax, not from the final discrete prediction.
- Spearman correlation is used for PK tasks instead of Pearson or RMSE, which is a common point of confusion.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Following the standard TDC protocol, we utilize task-specific metrics including Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for regression tasks, Spearman’s Correlation for pharmacokinetics, and AUROC or AUPRC for classification tasks
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{kuznetsov2026mmai,
title={MMAI Gym for Science: Training Liquid Foundation Models for Drug Discovery},
author={Kuznetsov et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2603.03517}
}
```
- arXiv: 2603.03517

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!