Skip to content
Back to skills

Talkbank Asr Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates the robustness of state-of-the-art automatic speech recognition (ASR) models on real-world, unstructured conversational speech compared to controlled, read-speech benchmarks. It specifically probes how conversational disfluencies, interruptions, and variable audio durations impact transcription accuracy. Use when the user wants to benchmark on TalkBank, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Word Error Rate.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythongitperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill talkbank-asr-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Talkbank Asr Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Talkbank Asr Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-talkbank-asr-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-talkbank-asr-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: talkbank-asr-eval
description: Evaluates the robustness of state-of-the-art automatic speech recognition (ASR) models on real-world, unstructured conversational speech compared to controlled, read-speech benchmarks. It specifically probes how conversational disfluencies, interruptions, and variable audio durations impact transcription accuracy. Use when the user wants to benchmark on TalkBank, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Word Error Rate.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2409.12042
  bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
  confidence: high
---

# talkbank-asr-eval

> ASR Benchmarking: Need for a More Representative Conversational Dataset — Maheshwari et al. (2024) (arXiv:2409.12042, 2024)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates the robustness of state-of-the-art automatic speech recognition (ASR) models on real-world, unstructured conversational speech compared to controlled, read-speech benchmarks. It specifically probes how conversational disfluencies, interruptions, and variable audio durations impact transcription accuracy.

## Datasets

- **TalkBank** — total ?; splits: test (-1); repo https://github.com/Diabolocom-Research/ConversationalDataset

## Metrics

- `Word Error Rate` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
  - Normalized Word Error Rate calculated as (Insertions + Deletions + Substitutions) / Total Reference Words. Reported as a decimal between 0 and 1.
- `Pearson correlation` — range: [-1, 1]
  - Measures the linear correlation between the normalized count of conversational-specific markers (e.g., pauses, laughter, interruptions) and the Word Error Rate per transcript.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Raw audio files (wav) of varying durations, including short segments (<20s) and long continuous speaker-switch recordings with silences.

**Output**: Transcribed text string corresponding to the audio input.

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_wer(predictions, references):
    total_words = sum(len(ref.split()) for ref in references)
    if total_words == 0: return 0.0
    edits = 0
    for pred, ref in zip(predictions, references):
        # Standard Levenshtein edit distance on word tokens
        edits += levenshtein_distance(pred.split(), ref.split())
    return edits / total_words
```

## Common pitfalls

- TalkBank Segments and TalkBank Switch are distinct variants with different audio lengths and silence patterns; results are not directly comparable without noting this distinction.
- Word Error Rate is reported as a decimal (e.g., 0.22) rather than a percentage, which can cause confusion when comparing to other ASR benchmarks.
- wav2vec2 was excluded from the Speaker Switch variant due to memory constraints on long audio files, so its results are only available for the Segments variant.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> In all these datasets, we rely on the test sets to evaluate the zero-shot performance of ASR models. We report the normalized Word Error Rate for all experiments.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{maheshwari2024asrbenchmarking,
  title={ASR Benchmarking: Need for a More Representative Conversational Dataset},
  author={Maheshwari et al. (2024)},
  year={2024},
  note={arXiv:2409.12042}
}
```

- arXiv: 2409.12042

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.