Tests clinical cross-modal prediction by evaluating whether ECG and blood lab measurements can jointly predict a subsequent chest X-ray in a zero-shot retrieval setting. It probes the model's ability to learn from incomplete training data and generalize to full modality combinations. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Symile-MIMIC, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports mean accuracy.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Symile Mimic Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-symile-mimic-eval)
---
name: symile-mimic-eval
description: Tests clinical cross-modal prediction by evaluating whether ECG and blood lab measurements can jointly predict a subsequent chest X-ray in a zero-shot retrieval setting. It probes the model's ability to learn from incomplete training data and generalize to full modality combinations. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Symile-MIMIC, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports mean accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2411.01053
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: high
---
# symile-mimic-eval
> Contrasting with Symile: Simple Model-Agnostic Representation Learning for Unlimited Modalities — Saporta et al. (2024) (arXiv:2411.01053, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Tests clinical cross-modal prediction by evaluating whether ECG and blood lab measurements can jointly predict a subsequent chest X-ray in a zero-shot retrieval setting. It probes the model's ability to learn from incomplete training data and generalize to full modality combinations.
## Datasets
- **Symile-MIMIC** — total 11622; splits: train/val (11041), test (581); repo https://github.com/rajesh-lab/symile
## Metrics
- `mean accuracy` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Top-1 retrieval accuracy among 10 candidates (1 positive CXR, 9 sampled negatives) for each query. Reported as mean across 10 bootstrap samples of the test set.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Paired electrocardiogram (ECG) reading and blood laboratory measurements (50 most common labs) collected within 24 hours of hospital admission.
**Output**: Predicted chest X-ray (CXR) image from the candidate set.
## Scoring recipe
```python
candidates = [true_cxr] + sample_9_negatives(test_set_cxr)
for each query in test_set:
scores = model.compute_similarity(query.ecg, query.labs, candidates)
pred = argmax(scores)
if pred == query.true_cxr:
correct += 1
return correct / len(test_set)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Assuming full-dataset negative sampling; the evaluation explicitly uses a 10-candidate set (1 positive + 9 sampled negatives) per query to mitigate overfitting and match clinical retrieval constraints.
- Overlooking the temporal constraint; CXRs must be taken 24-72 hours post-admission, while ECGs/labs are within 24 hours of admission, which affects clinical validity and evaluation setup.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> In [Figure 5]b, we report mean accuracy for Symile and CLIP over 10 bootstrap samples of the test set. While both models surpass random chance (0.1), Symile achieves an average accuracy of $0.435\pm 0.007$ (SE), outperforming CLIP’s $0.387\pm 0.003$ (SE).
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{saporta2024symile,
title={Contrasting with Symile: Simple Model-Agnostic Representation Learning for Unlimited Modalities},
author={Saporta et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2411.01053}
}
```
- arXiv: 2411.01053