Probes a model's ability to predict social engagement (upvote ratio) from multimodal inputs (images, videos, and text). It evaluates cross-modal fusion and regression capabilities on socially grounded, context-rich data. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SVLD, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Mean L1point ratio prediction error.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Svld Points Ratio Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-svld-points-ratio-eval)
---
name: svld-points-ratio-eval
description: Probes a model's ability to predict social engagement (upvote ratio) from multimodal inputs (images, videos, and text). It evaluates cross-modal fusion and regression capabilities on socially grounded, context-rich data. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SVLD, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Mean L1point ratio prediction error.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2006.08335
bibtex_key: xue2020svld
confidence: high
---
# svld-points-ratio-eval
> A Dataset and Benchmarks for Multimedia Social Analysis — Xue et al. (2020) (arXiv:2006.08335, 2020)
## What this evaluates
Probes a model's ability to predict social engagement (upvote ratio) from multimodal inputs (images, videos, and text). It evaluates cross-modal fusion and regression capabilities on socially grounded, context-rich data.
## Datasets
- **SVLD** — total 365336; splits: train (324888), val (40448), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `Mean L1point ratio prediction error` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Mean Absolute Error (L1 loss) between the predicted points ratio and the ground-truth ratio (upvotes / total votes). Lower values indicate better regression performance.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Per post: an image (resized to 224x224), a video (up to 64 frames sampled at ≤5 fps, padded with the last frame if needed), and three text fields (description, title, top comment) tokenized with BERT and padded/truncated to 102 tokens.
**Output**: A single scalar float representing the predicted points ratio (upvotes divided by total votes).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metric(predictions, gold):
errors = [abs(p - g) for p, g in zip(predictions, gold)]
return sum(errors) / len(errors)
```
## Common pitfalls
- The test set is explicitly marked as 'unreleased', so external evaluation is not possible without author access.
- The metric is L1 error (lower is better), not accuracy or correlation; readers may mistakenly treat it as a classification score.
- Video preprocessing pads with the last frame when frames are insufficient, which can bias results if not replicated exactly.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Our goal in this baseline experiment is to model the points-ratio of a sample, the number of upvotes divided by the total number of votes. This is a number between zero and one, which roughly reflects the attitude of the community towards a particular post. Table 3 reports the Mean L1point ratio prediction error.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{xue2020svld,
title={A Dataset and Benchmarks for Multimedia Social Analysis},
author={Xue et al. (2020)},
year={2020},
note={arXiv:2006.08335}
}
```
- arXiv: 2006.08335