Probes a model's ability to predict social engagement (upvote ratio) from multimodal inputs (images, videos, and text). It evaluates cross-modal fusion and regression capabilities on socially grounded, context-rich data. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SVLD, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Mean L1point ratio prediction error.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill svld-points-ratio-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Svld Points Ratio Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-svld-points-ratio-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: svld-points-ratio-eval
description: Probes a model's ability to predict social engagement (upvote ratio) from multimodal inputs (images, videos, and text). It evaluates cross-modal fusion and regression capabilities on socially grounded, context-rich data. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SVLD, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Mean L1point ratio prediction error.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2006.08335
bibtex_key: xue2020svld
confidence: high
---
# svld-points-ratio-eval
> A Dataset and Benchmarks for Multimedia Social Analysis — Xue et al. (2020) (arXiv:2006.08335, 2020)
## What this evaluates
Probes a model's ability to predict social engagement (upvote ratio) from multimodal inputs (images, videos, and text). It evaluates cross-modal fusion and regression capabilities on socially grounded, context-rich data.
## Datasets
- **SVLD** — total 365336; splits: train (324888), val (40448), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `Mean L1point ratio prediction error` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Mean Absolute Error (L1 loss) between the predicted points ratio and the ground-truth ratio (upvotes / total votes). Lower values indicate better regression performance.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Per post: an image (resized to 224x224), a video (up to 64 frames sampled at ≤5 fps, padded with the last frame if needed), and three text fields (description, title, top comment) tokenized with BERT and padded/truncated to 102 tokens.
**Output**: A single scalar float representing the predicted points ratio (upvotes divided by total votes).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metric(predictions, gold):
errors = [abs(p - g) for p, g in zip(predictions, gold)]
return sum(errors) / len(errors)
```
## Common pitfalls
- The test set is explicitly marked as 'unreleased', so external evaluation is not possible without author access.
- The metric is L1 error (lower is better), not accuracy or correlation; readers may mistakenly treat it as a classification score.
- Video preprocessing pads with the last frame when frames are insufficient, which can bias results if not replicated exactly.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Our goal in this baseline experiment is to model the points-ratio of a sample, the number of upvotes divided by the total number of votes. This is a number between zero and one, which roughly reflects the attitude of the community towards a particular post. Table 3 reports the Mean L1point ratio prediction error.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{xue2020svld,
title={A Dataset and Benchmarks for Multimedia Social Analysis},
author={Xue et al. (2020)},
year={2020},
note={arXiv:2006.08335}
}
```
- arXiv: 2006.08335

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!