Evaluates Hindi extractive question answering capabilities using multiple-choice questions generated from Wikipedia contexts. It probes a model's ability to comprehend Hindi text, locate relevant information, and select the correct answer from four options under varying context availability settings. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Suvach, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill suvach-hindi-qa-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Suvach Hindi Qa Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-suvach-hindi-qa-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: suvach-hindi-qa-eval
description: Evaluates Hindi extractive question answering capabilities using multiple-choice questions generated from Wikipedia contexts. It probes a model's ability to comprehend Hindi text, locate relevant information, and select the correct answer from four options under varying context availability settings. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Suvach, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2404.19254
bibtex_key: narayanan2024suvach
confidence: medium
---
# suvach-hindi-qa-eval
> Suvach -- Generated Hindi QA benchmark — Narayanan et al. (2024) (arXiv:2404.19254, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates Hindi extractive question answering capabilities using multiple-choice questions generated from Wikipedia contexts. It probes a model's ability to comprehend Hindi text, locate relevant information, and select the correct answer from four options under varying context availability settings.
## Datasets
- **Suvach** — total 100000; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Standard exact-match accuracy for multiple-choice questions. Calculated as the fraction of instances where the model's predicted choice exactly matches the gold answer.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Hindi context (optional), Hindi question, and four multiple-choice options (optional). Evaluated in three settings: question only, question with context, and question with context and choices.
**Output**: A single selected choice from the four options.
## Scoring recipe
```python
correct = 0
total = 0
for instance in dataset:
pred = model.generate(instance.context, instance.question, instance.choices)
if pred == instance.answer:
correct += 1
total += 1
return correct / total
```
## Common pitfalls
- The benchmark relies on LLM-generated questions validated by LLMs, which may not capture the full diversity or difficulty of human-annotated QA.
- Evaluation results vary significantly across the three input settings (with/without context), making cross-study comparisons difficult if the setting is not explicitly reported.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> This dataset consists of over 100k question answers in Hindi, with 1200 tokens per question on average. The generated part of data contain Secret Context, Question, Choices, Answer, and Description. The question will be accompanied with 4 Choices and one and only one of them would be the correct answer. ... 1. Question only : Use only the question in evaluation prompt. 2. Question with context: Provide the context along with the question in evaluation prompt. 3. Question with context and choices: This would be the most easy task. The context and four possible answers are given in the evaluation prompt along with the question. Choose the most appropriate response.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{narayanan2024suvach,
title={Suvach -- Generated Hindi QA benchmark},
author={Narayanan et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2404.19254}
}
```
- arXiv: 2404.19254
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!