This benchmark evaluates whether deep learning models can accurately predict the epicentral distance of an earthquake from single-station ground motion waveforms. It specifically probes whether models learn intrinsic seismic features or merely exploit highly correlated auxiliary signals like P/S wave arrival times. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Stanford Earthquake Dataset (STEAD), or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Mean Absolute Error (MAE).
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Stead Distance Prediction Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-stead-distance-prediction-eval)
---
name: stead-distance-prediction-eval
description: This benchmark evaluates whether deep learning models can accurately predict the epicentral distance of an earthquake from single-station ground motion waveforms. It specifically probes whether models learn intrinsic seismic features or merely exploit highly correlated auxiliary signals like P/S wave arrival times. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Stanford Earthquake Dataset (STEAD), or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Mean Absolute Error (MAE).
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2403.07569
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: medium
---
# stead-distance-prediction-eval
> Exploring Challenges in Deep Learning of Single-Station Ground Motion Records — Çağlar et al. (2024) (arXiv:2403.07569, 2024)
## What this evaluates
This benchmark evaluates whether deep learning models can accurately predict the epicentral distance of an earthquake from single-station ground motion waveforms. It specifically probes whether models learn intrinsic seismic features or merely exploit highly correlated auxiliary signals like P/S wave arrival times.
## Datasets
- **Stanford Earthquake Dataset (STEAD)** — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `Mean Absolute Error (MAE)` **(primary)** — range: other
- L1 loss computed as the average absolute difference between predicted epicentral distance and true epicentral distance. The true distance is calculated using the haversine formula in kilometers.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Three-channel ground motion time-series signals, optionally concatenated with P/S wave arrival time information.
**Output**: A single scalar value representing the predicted epicentral distance in kilometers.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_mae(predictions, true_distances_km):
# true_distances_km are precomputed via haversine formula
mae = np.mean(np.abs(predictions - true_distances_km))
return mae
```
## Common pitfalls
- Models may achieve low error by simply learning the P-S arrival time difference rather than extracting features from the waveform itself.
- Epicentral distance must be computed using the haversine formula on spherical coordinates, not Euclidean distance.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> For distance prediction, mean absolute error (L1 loss) is chosen and directly calculated using the haversine distance in kilometers between the epicenter and the recording station.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{caglar2024groundmotion,
title={Exploring Challenges in Deep Learning of Single-Station Ground Motion Records},
author={Çağlar et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2403.07569}
}
```
- arXiv: 2403.07569