Evaluates multimodal LLMs on 3D spatial reasoning, depth/distance estimation, and general visual question answering. It probes the model's ability to ground objects in 3D space, understand spatial relations, and generalize to real-world VQA tasks using only RGB inputs. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SpatialThinker Evaluation Suite (12 VQA Benchmarks), or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill spatialthinker-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Spatialthinker Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-spatialthinker-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: spatialthinker-eval
description: Evaluates multimodal LLMs on 3D spatial reasoning, depth/distance estimation, and general visual question answering. It probes the model's ability to ground objects in 3D space, understand spatial relations, and generalize to real-world VQA tasks using only RGB inputs. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SpatialThinker Evaluation Suite (12 VQA Benchmarks), or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2511.07403
bibtex_key: batra2025spatialthinker
confidence: high
---
# spatialthinker-eval
> SpatialThinker: Reinforcing 3D Reasoning in Multimodal LLMs via Spatial Rewards — Hunar Batra et al. (arXiv:2511.07403, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates multimodal LLMs on 3D spatial reasoning, depth/distance estimation, and general visual question answering. It probes the model's ability to ground objects in 3D space, understand spatial relations, and generalize to real-world VQA tasks using only RGB inputs.
## Datasets
- **SpatialThinker Evaluation Suite (12 VQA Benchmarks)** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `Accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly answered questions. Computed as the number of exact matches between the model's generated answer and the ground-truth answer divided by the total number of instances.
## Input / output format
**Input**: RGB image paired with a natural language question.
**Output**: Natural language text answer.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_accuracy(predictions, gold_answers):
correct = 0
for pred, gold in zip(predictions, gold_answers):
if pred.strip().lower() == gold.strip().lower():
correct += 1
return (correct / len(predictions)) * 100
```
## Common pitfalls
- Evaluated strictly zero-shot with greedy decoding (temperature=0.0), not few-shot or with sampling.
- SpatialRGPT uses depth inputs while all other baselines use only RGB, creating an input modality mismatch.
- Proprietary models (GPT-4o, Claude) use their default system prompts, which may differ from open-source model prompting.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> All models are evaluated in a zero-shot setting using greedy decoding (temperature = 0.0). Accuracy is the primary evaluation metric.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{batra2025spatialthinker,
title={SpatialThinker: Reinforcing 3D Reasoning in Multimodal LLMs via Spatial Rewards},
author={Hunar Batra et al.},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2511.07403}
}
```
- arXiv: 2511.07403
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!