Evaluates a vision-language model's ability to perform spatial reasoning tasks, including relative positioning, counting, size comparison, and cross-dataset generalization. It probes whether models learn transferable spatial concepts rather than memorizing dataset-specific patterns or visual artifacts. Use when the user wants to benchmark on GRAID-BDD, GRAID-NuImages, BLINK, A-OKVQA, NaturalBench, RealWorldQA, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Spatial Reasoning Vqa Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-spatial-reasoning-vqa-eval)
---
name: spatial-reasoning-vqa-eval
description: Evaluates a vision-language model's ability to perform spatial reasoning tasks, including relative positioning, counting, size comparison, and cross-dataset generalization. It probes whether models learn transferable spatial concepts rather than memorizing dataset-specific patterns or visual artifacts. Use when the user wants to benchmark on GRAID-BDD, GRAID-NuImages, BLINK, A-OKVQA, NaturalBench, RealWorldQA, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2510.22118
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: high
---
# spatial-reasoning-vqa-eval
> GRAID: Enhancing Spatial Reasoning of VLMs Through High-Fidelity Data Generation — Elmaaroufi et al. (2025) (arXiv:2510.22118, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates a vision-language model's ability to perform spatial reasoning tasks, including relative positioning, counting, size comparison, and cross-dataset generalization. It probes whether models learn transferable spatial concepts rather than memorizing dataset-specific patterns or visual artifacts.
## Datasets
- **GRAID-BDD** — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (1000)
- **GRAID-NuImages** — total ?; splits: test (1000)
- **BLINK** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **A-OKVQA** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **NaturalBench** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **RealWorldQA** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Standard exact-match accuracy: the model's predicted answer is compared to the ground-truth answer, with 1 point awarded for a match and 0 otherwise. Aggregated as a percentage over the test set.
## Input / output format
**Input**: RGB image paired with a natural language question requiring spatial reasoning (e.g., relative position, counting, size comparison).
**Output**: Textual answer or selected option from a multiple-choice set, as generated by the VLM.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_accuracy(predictions, gold_answers):
correct = 0
for pred, gold in zip(predictions, gold_answers):
if normalize_answer(pred) == normalize_answer(gold):
correct += 1
return (correct / len(gold_answers)) * 100
```
## Common pitfalls
- Models may overfit to specific question templates or dataset-specific visual distributions (e.g., training on car-heavy GRAID-BDD but evaluating on diverse BLINK scenes).
- Using different evaluation frameworks or decoding strategies can cause inconsistent results; the authors explicitly switched to VLMEvalKit to match reported baselines.
- Adversarial benchmarks like NaturalBench are designed to expose memorization; stable scores here indicate genuine spatial reasoning rather than shortcut learning.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We observe a significant 32.5% improvement on A-OKVQA and 15.94% overall improvement on BLINK, with particularly impressive gains on core spatial reasoning tasks: +41.13% on Relative Depth, +31.98% on Visual Correspondence, and +30.77% on Spatial Relations.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{elmaaroufi2025graid,
title={GRAID: Enhancing Spatial Reasoning of VLMs Through High-Fidelity Data Generation},
author={Elmaaroufi et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2510.22118}
}
```
- arXiv: 2510.22118