Evaluates the speech language model's performance across multiple benchmarks including linguistic acceptability, story completion, audio generation quality, and cross-domain text generation perplexity. Use when the user wants to benchmark on sBLIMP, StoryCloze, People Speech, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports MOSnet.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill slamming-additional-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Slamming Additional Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-slamming-additional-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: slamming-additional-eval
description: Evaluates the speech language model's performance across multiple benchmarks including linguistic acceptability, story completion, audio generation quality, and cross-domain text generation perplexity. Use when the user wants to benchmark on sBLIMP, StoryCloze, People Speech, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports MOSnet.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2502.15814
bibtex_key: maimon2025slamming
confidence: medium
---
# slamming-additional-eval
> Slamming: Training a Speech Language Model on One GPU in a Day — Maimon et al. (2025) (arXiv:2502.15814, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the speech language model's performance across multiple benchmarks including linguistic acceptability, story completion, audio generation quality, and cross-domain text generation perplexity.
## Datasets
- **sBLIMP** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **StoryCloze** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **People Speech** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `sBLIMP` — range: [0, 1]
- Accuracy on linguistic acceptability judgments.
- `tSC` — range: [0, 1]
- Accuracy on text story completion tasks.
- `sSC` — range: [0, 1]
- Accuracy on speech story completion tasks.
- `MOSnet` **(primary)** — range: other
- MOSnet score predicting mean opinion score for audio generation quality.
- `GenPPL` — range: other
- Generation perplexity on out-of-domain prompts.
- `BLEU` — range: other
- BLEU score for generated text quality.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Text prompts for sBLIMP, StoryCloze, and People Speech; audio/text inputs for generation tasks.
**Output**: Generated text continuations or audio samples.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(predictions, gold):
acc = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold) if p == g) / len(gold)
bleu = corpus_bleu([gold], predictions)
ppl = exp(mean(cross_entropy_loss(predictions, gold)))
mos = mosnet_model.predict(predictions)
return {'accuracy': acc, 'bleu': bleu, 'ppl': ppl, 'mosnet': mos}
```
## Common pitfalls
- MOSnet is a learned proxy metric, not a direct human MOS score.
- GenPPL and BLEU are evaluated on the People Speech test set, which may contain overlapping samples with baseline models' training data.
- Validation loss and ablation results are reported for specific context lengths and batch sizes rather than a single standardized setup.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> For completeness we also provide MOS proxy results for our models compared to TWIST and Align-SLM models. We follow a similar setup to Lin et al. (2024) and use MOSnet to test the audio’s generation quality of our models. It is important to note that we use the same vocoder as TWIST and Align-SLM. The results can be seen in Table[10].
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{maimon2025slamming,
title={Slamming: Training a Speech Language Model on One GPU in a Day},
author={Maimon et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2502.15814}
}
```
- arXiv: 2502.15814
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!