Skip to content
Back to skills

Sincnet Speaker Recognition Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates text-independent speaker identification and verification on raw audio waveforms, testing the model's ability to extract speaker-specific features and generalize across different corpus sizes and utterance lengths. Use when the user wants to benchmark on TIMIT, Librispeech, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythontestingperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill sincnet-speaker-recognition-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Sincnet Speaker Recognition Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Sincnet Speaker Recognition Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-sincnet-speaker-recognition-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-sincnet-speaker-recognition-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: sincnet-speaker-recognition-eval
description: Evaluates text-independent speaker identification and verification on raw audio waveforms, testing the model's ability to extract speaker-specific features and generalize across different corpus sizes and utterance lengths. Use when the user wants to benchmark on TIMIT, Librispeech, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 1808.00158
  bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
  confidence: high
---

# sincnet-speaker-recognition-eval

> Speaker Recognition from Raw Waveform with SincNet — Ravanelli et al. (2018) (arXiv:1808.00158, 2018)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates text-independent speaker identification and verification on raw audio waveforms, testing the model's ability to extract speaker-specific features and generalize across different corpus sizes and utterance lengths.

## Datasets

- **TIMIT** — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
- **Librispeech** — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (-1)

## Metrics

- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
  - Identification accuracy is computed by averaging frame-level softmax posteriors across a sentence and voting for the speaker with the highest average posterior. Verification performance is assessed using Equal Error Rate (EER) based on cosine distance between d-vectors or direct softmax posterior scores.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Raw audio waveform chunks of 200ms duration with 10ms overlap. For verification, a genuine enrollment utterance and a test utterance are provided.

**Output**: Per frame: softmax posterior probabilities over all target speakers. Per sentence: averaged posterior probabilities, with the final prediction being the speaker with the maximum average posterior.

## Scoring recipe

```python
frame_probs = model.predict(chunk)
sentence_probs = sum(frame_probs) / len(frame_probs)
predicted_speaker = argmax(sentence_probs)
is_correct = (predicted_speaker == true_speaker)

# Verification
dvec_test = model.get_last_hidden_layer(test_chunk)
dvec_enroll = model.get_last_hidden_layer(enroll_chunk)
cos_dist = dot(dvec_test, dvec_enroll) / (norm(dvec_test) * norm(dvec_enroll))
# EER computed over threshold sweep on cos_dist
```

## Common pitfalls

- Removing calibration sentences from TIMIT to ensure text-independent evaluation, which changes the standard TIMIT split.
- Splitting Librispeech sentences with internal silences >125ms into multiple chunks, altering standard utterance boundaries.
- Using random impostors from a different speaker pool for open-set verification, requiring careful threshold calibration.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> Frame-level speaker classification was obtained by applying a softmax classifier, providing a set of posterior probabilities over the targeted speakers. A sentence-level classification was simply derived by averaging the frame predictions and voting for the speaker which maximizes the average posterior. The speaker verification system was derived from the speaker-id neural network considering two possible setups. First, we consider the d-vector framework [13, 21], which relies on the output of the last hidden layer and computes the cosine distance between test and the claimed speaker d-vectors.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{ravanelli2018sincnet,
  title={Speaker Recognition from Raw Waveform with SincNet},
  author={Ravanelli et al. (2018)},
  year={2018},
  note={arXiv:1808.00158}
}
```

- arXiv: 1808.00158

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.