Skip to content
Back to skills

Sepnet Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates deep learning models for forecasting solar energetic particle (SEP) events using solar magnetic field parameters and historical eruptive features. It probes the model's ability to classify general and operational SEP occurrences under different feature sets and temporal conditions. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SEPVAL, CLEAR, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythongogit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill sepnet-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Sepnet Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Sepnet Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-sepnet-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-sepnet-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: sepnet-eval
description: Evaluates deep learning models for forecasting solar energetic particle (SEP) events using solar magnetic field parameters and historical eruptive features. It probes the model's ability to classify general and operational SEP occurrences under different feature sets and temporal conditions. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SEPVAL, CLEAR, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2512.12786
  bibtex_key: yu2025sepnet
  confidence: high
---

# sepnet-eval

> Solar Energetic Particle Forecasting with Multi-Task Deep Learning: SEPNET — Yu et al. (2025) (arXiv:2512.12786, 2025)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates deep learning models for forecasting solar energetic particle (SEP) events using solar magnetic field parameters and historical eruptive features. It probes the model's ability to classify general and operational SEP occurrences under different feature sets and temporal conditions.

## Datasets

- **SEPVAL** — total ?; splits: test (-1); repo https://github.com/yuyian/SEP-Prediction.git
- **CLEAR** — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (-1); repo https://github.com/yuyian/SEP-Prediction.git

## Metrics

- `F1` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
  - Harmonic mean of precision and recall. Calculated as 2 * TP / (2 * TP + FP + FN).
- `TSS` — range: [-1, 1]
  - True Skill Score, also known as Hanssen-Kuipers discriminant. Measures the proportion of correctly detected events minus the proportion of false alarms.
- `HSS` — range: [-1, 1]
  - Heidke Skill Score, measures the accuracy of the forecast relative to random chance. Ranges from -1 to 1, with 1 indicating perfect skill.
- `POD` — range: [0, 1]
  - Probability of Detection, equivalent to recall or sensitivity. Calculated as TP / (TP + FN).
- `FAR` — range: [0, 1]
  - False Alarm Rate, measures the fraction of predicted events that did not occur. Calculated as FP / (FP + TN).
- `ACC` — range: [0, 1]
  - Overall accuracy, the fraction of correct predictions out of total samples.
- `AUC` — range: [0, 1]
  - Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, measuring the model's ability to discriminate between classes across all thresholds.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Temporal sequences of SHARP magnetic field parameters, optionally combined with historical flare and CME features.

**Output**: Binary classification (SEP event vs. non-SEP) or continuous probability score. A decision threshold is optimized to maximize HSS for operational forecasting.

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_metrics(y_true, y_pred, threshold=0.5):
    y_bin = (y_pred >= threshold).astype(int)
    tp = np.sum((y_bin == 1) & (y_true == 1))
    fn = np.sum((y_bin == 0) & (y_true == 1))
    fp = np.sum((y_bin == 1) & (y_true == 0))
    tn = np.sum((y_bin == 0) & (y_true == 0))
    acc = (tp + tn) / (tp + tn + fp + fn)
    f1 = 2 * tp / (2 * tp + fp + fn)
    pod = tp / (tp + fn)
    far = fp / (fp + tn)
    tss = pod + (tn / (tn + fp)) - 1
    hss = (tp * tn - fp * fn) / ((tp + fp) * (fp + tn) + (tp + fn) * (fn + tn))
    return {'ACC': acc, 'F1': f1, 'POD': pod, 'FAR': far, 'TSS': tss, 'HSS': hss}
```

## Common pitfalls

- Class imbalance in solar event data leads to elevated false alarm rates (high FAR) even when detection rates (POD) are high.
- Real-time SHARP parameters differ from definitive HARP data used in training, causing systematic underestimation of flare counts and prediction mismatches.
- Threshold optimization for operational SEP events is performed on the training/validation split, which may not generalize perfectly to out-of-time real-world data.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> For a rigorous comparison with the state-of-the-art pre-eruptive models (denoted as SoA) on SEPVAL *[Whitman2026]*, we performed 50 independent runs for each configuration to derive the median and $75$th percentile (target quantile) metrics. Our models incorporating SHARP parameters generally match or outperform the SoA benchmarks in terms of standard evaluation metrics such as ACC, AUC, F1, POD, TSS, and HSS.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{yu2025sepnet,
  title={Solar Energetic Particle Forecasting with Multi-Task Deep Learning: SEPNET},
  author={Yu et al. (2025)},
  year={2025},
  note={arXiv:2512.12786}
}
```

- arXiv: 2512.12786

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.