This benchmark evaluates structured sentiment analysis by testing a model's ability to extract sentiment targets, opinions, and their relational dependencies from text. It probes cross-lingual generalization and the capacity to repurpose semantic dependency parsers for sentiment graph generation. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SemEval-2022 Task 10, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Semeval2022 Task10 Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-semeval2022-task10-eval)
---
name: semeval2022-task10-eval
description: This benchmark evaluates structured sentiment analysis by testing a model's ability to extract sentiment targets, opinions, and their relational dependencies from text. It probes cross-lingual generalization and the capacity to repurpose semantic dependency parsers for sentiment graph generation. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SemEval-2022 Task 10, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2204.12820
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: high
---
# semeval2022-task10-eval
> LyS_ACoruña at SemEval-2022 Task 10: Repurposing Off-the-Shelf Tools for Sentiment Analysis as Semantic Dependency Parsing — Alonso-Alonso et al. (2022) (arXiv:2204.12820, 2022)
## What this evaluates
This benchmark evaluates structured sentiment analysis by testing a model's ability to extract sentiment targets, opinions, and their relational dependencies from text. It probes cross-lingual generalization and the capacity to repurpose semantic dependency parsers for sentiment graph generation.
## Datasets
- **SemEval-2022 Task 10** — total ?; splits: train (-1), dev (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `F1` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- F1 = 2 * (precision * recall) / (precision + recall), computed over the set of predicted sentiment graph elements (nodes and edges) against gold annotations.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Raw text sentences or reviews with annotated sentiment targets, opinions, and dependency relations.
**Output**: Structured sentiment graphs (sentiment dependency parses) representing extracted targets, opinions, and their directed relations.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_f1(pred_graph, gold_graph):
pred_elements = set(pred_graph.nodes + pred_graph.edges)
gold_elements = set(gold_graph.nodes + gold_graph.edges)
tp = len(pred_elements & gold_elements)
fp = len(pred_elements - gold_elements)
fn = len(gold_elements - pred_elements)
prec = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) > 0 else 0.0
rec = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) > 0 else 0.0
return 2 * prec * rec / (prec + rec) if (prec + rec) > 0 else 0.0
```
## Common pitfalls
- Evaluating only sentiment polarity or target extraction without capturing the full dependency graph structure will yield artificially high scores and misrepresent model capability.
- The SemEval-2022 organizers updated training files due to segmentation bugs shortly before the deadline; models must be trained on the final updated versions to ensure fair comparison across submissions.
- Cross-lingual zero-shot setups using word-level translated treebanks underperform compared to training on merged English treebanks without translation, contrary to typical cross-lingual expectations.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> <tr><td>Corpus</td><td>Model</td><td>Strategy</td><td>F1</td></tr>
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{alons2022lysacoru,
title={LyS_ACoruña at SemEval-2022 Task 10: Repurposing Off-the-Shelf Tools for Sentiment Analysis as Semantic Dependency Parsing},
author={Alonso-Alonso et al. (2022)},
year={2022},
note={arXiv:2204.12820}
}
```
- arXiv: 2204.12820