Detects persuasion techniques in multimodal memes by jointly analyzing text and image content. It probes cross-modal alignment and interaction modeling for persuasive content detection. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SemEval-2021 Task 6 Subtask 3, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1-Micro.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill semeval2021task6-st3 --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Semeval2021task6 St3?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-semeval2021task6-st3)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: semeval2021task6-st3
description: Detects persuasion techniques in multimodal memes by jointly analyzing text and image content. It probes cross-modal alignment and interaction modeling for persuasive content detection. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SemEval-2021 Task 6 Subtask 3, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1-Micro.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2105.09284
bibtex_key: dimitrov2021semevaltask6
confidence: medium
---
# semeval2021task6-st3
> SemEval-2021 Task 6: Detection of Persuasion Techniques in Texts and Images — Dimitrov et al. (2021) (arXiv:2105.09284, 2021)
## What this evaluates
Detects persuasion techniques in multimodal memes by jointly analyzing text and image content. It probes cross-modal alignment and interaction modeling for persuasive content detection.
## Datasets
- **SemEval-2021 Task 6 Subtask 3** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `F1-Micro` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Micro-averaged F1 score for multimodal persuasion technique detection.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Paired text and image (meme).
**Output**: Multilabel classification of persuasion techniques present in the meme.
## Scoring recipe
```python
tp = fp = fn = 0
for p, g in zip(predictions, golds):
for label in all_labels:
if label in p and label in g: tp += 1
elif label in p and label not in g: fp += 1
elif label not in p and label in g: fn += 1
prec = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) > 0 else 0
rec = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) > 0 else 0
return 2 * prec * rec / (prec + rec) if (prec + rec) > 0 else 0
```
## Common pitfalls
- Modeling modality interaction is more important than simple feature fusion.
- Text and image representations often use different architectures (e.g., BERT for text, ResNet for images) requiring careful alignment.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The evaluation results are shown in Table 3... The systems are ordered by the official score: F1-micro. Subtask 3 (Multimodal: Memes)... This is a very rich and very interesting table. We can see that transformers were quite popular for text representation... For the visual modality, the most common representations were variants of ResNet...
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{dimitrov2021semevaltask6,
title={SemEval-2021 Task 6: Detection of Persuasion Techniques in Texts and Images},
author={Dimitrov et al. (2021)},
year={2021},
note={arXiv:2105.09284}
}
```
- arXiv: 2105.09284
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!