Detects persuasion techniques in multimodal memes by jointly analyzing text and image content. It probes cross-modal alignment and interaction modeling for persuasive content detection. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SemEval-2021 Task 6 Subtask 3, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1-Micro.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Semeval2021task6 St3?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-semeval2021task6-st3)
---
name: semeval2021task6-st3
description: Detects persuasion techniques in multimodal memes by jointly analyzing text and image content. It probes cross-modal alignment and interaction modeling for persuasive content detection. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SemEval-2021 Task 6 Subtask 3, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1-Micro.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2105.09284
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: medium
---
# semeval2021task6-st3
> SemEval-2021 Task 6: Detection of Persuasion Techniques in Texts and Images — Dimitrov et al. (2021) (arXiv:2105.09284, 2021)
## What this evaluates
Detects persuasion techniques in multimodal memes by jointly analyzing text and image content. It probes cross-modal alignment and interaction modeling for persuasive content detection.
## Datasets
- **SemEval-2021 Task 6 Subtask 3** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `F1-Micro` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Micro-averaged F1 score for multimodal persuasion technique detection.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Paired text and image (meme).
**Output**: Multilabel classification of persuasion techniques present in the meme.
## Scoring recipe
```python
tp = fp = fn = 0
for p, g in zip(predictions, golds):
for label in all_labels:
if label in p and label in g: tp += 1
elif label in p and label not in g: fp += 1
elif label not in p and label in g: fn += 1
prec = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) > 0 else 0
rec = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) > 0 else 0
return 2 * prec * rec / (prec + rec) if (prec + rec) > 0 else 0
```
## Common pitfalls
- Modeling modality interaction is more important than simple feature fusion.
- Text and image representations often use different architectures (e.g., BERT for text, ResNet for images) requiring careful alignment.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The evaluation results are shown in Table 3... The systems are ordered by the official score: F1-micro. Subtask 3 (Multimodal: Memes)... This is a very rich and very interesting table. We can see that transformers were quite popular for text representation... For the visual modality, the most common representations were variants of ResNet...
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{dimitrov2021semevaltask6,
title={SemEval-2021 Task 6: Detection of Persuasion Techniques in Texts and Images},
author={Dimitrov et al. (2021)},
year={2021},
note={arXiv:2105.09284}
}
```
- arXiv: 2105.09284