Detects persuasion techniques in unimodal text by classifying which techniques are present in a given text snippet. It probes the model's ability to perform multilabel classification on propaganda and persuasive content. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SemEval-2021 Task 6 Subtask 1, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1-Micro.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill semeval2021task6-st1 --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Semeval2021task6 St1?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-semeval2021task6-st1)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: semeval2021task6-st1
description: Detects persuasion techniques in unimodal text by classifying which techniques are present in a given text snippet. It probes the model's ability to perform multilabel classification on propaganda and persuasive content. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SemEval-2021 Task 6 Subtask 1, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1-Micro.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2105.09284
bibtex_key: dimitrov2021semevaltask6
confidence: high
---
# semeval2021task6-st1
> SemEval-2021 Task 6: Detection of Persuasion Techniques in Texts and Images — Dimitrov et al. (2021) (arXiv:2105.09284, 2021)
## What this evaluates
Detects persuasion techniques in unimodal text by classifying which techniques are present in a given text snippet. It probes the model's ability to perform multilabel classification on propaganda and persuasive content.
## Datasets
- **SemEval-2021 Task 6 Subtask 1** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `F1-Micro` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Micro-averaged F1 score computed over all persuasion technique labels across the dataset.
- `F1-Macro` — range: [0, 1]
- Macro-averaged F1 score computed over all persuasion technique labels.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Raw text snippet.
**Output**: Multilabel classification: a set of persuasion technique labels (e.g., Loaded Language, Repetition) applicable to the text.
## Scoring recipe
```python
tp = fp = fn = 0
for p, g in zip(predictions, golds):
for label in all_labels:
if label in p and label in g: tp += 1
elif label in p and label not in g: fp += 1
elif label not in p and label in g: fn += 1
prec = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) > 0 else 0
rec = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) > 0 else 0
return 2 * prec * rec / (prec + rec) if (prec + rec) > 0 else 0
```
## Common pitfalls
- Using image features for Subtask 1 is strictly prohibited and leads to disqualification.
- Class imbalance is significant; a majority-class baseline always predicts 'Loaded Language'.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The evaluation results are shown in Table 3, which also includes two baselines: (i) random, and (ii) majority class. The latter always predicts Loaded Language, as it is the most frequent technique for Subtask 1... Table 3: Results for Subtask 1. The systems are ordered by the official score: F1-micro.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{dimitrov2021semevaltask6,
title={SemEval-2021 Task 6: Detection of Persuasion Techniques in Texts and Images},
author={Dimitrov et al. (2021)},
year={2021},
note={arXiv:2105.09284}
}
```
- arXiv: 2105.09284
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!