Evaluates the ability of self-distillation augmented masked autoencoders to learn robust visual representations from histopathological images for downstream tasks like classification, segmentation, and detection, particularly in low-class or cross-domain settings. Use when the user wants to benchmark on PatchCamelyon (PCam), NCT-CRC-HE (NCT), MSIIvsMSS, MoNuSeg, Glas, NuCLS, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports top-1 accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill sd-mae-histopath-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Sd Mae Histopath Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-sd-mae-histopath-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: sd-mae-histopath-eval
description: Evaluates the ability of self-distillation augmented masked autoencoders to learn robust visual representations from histopathological images for downstream tasks like classification, segmentation, and detection, particularly in low-class or cross-domain settings. Use when the user wants to benchmark on PatchCamelyon (PCam), NCT-CRC-HE (NCT), MSIIvsMSS, MoNuSeg, Glas, NuCLS, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports top-1 accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2203.16983
bibtex_key: luo2022selfdistillation
confidence: high
---
# sd-mae-histopath-eval
> Self-distillation Augmented Masked Autoencoders for Histopathological Image Classification — Luo et al. (2022) (arXiv:2203.16983, 2022)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the ability of self-distillation augmented masked autoencoders to learn robust visual representations from histopathological images for downstream tasks like classification, segmentation, and detection, particularly in low-class or cross-domain settings.
## Datasets
- **PatchCamelyon (PCam)** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
- **NCT-CRC-HE (NCT)** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
- **MSIIvsMSS** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
- **MoNuSeg** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
- **Glas** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
- **NuCLS** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `top-1 accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Fraction of correctly classified images out of the total number of images in the evaluation set.
- `mIoU` — range: percent
- Mean Intersection over Union across all semantic classes, computed as the average of IoU per class.
- `box mAP@0.5` — range: percent
- Mean Average Precision for bounding box detection averaged over recall thresholds at an IoU threshold of 0.5.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Histopathological image patches processed through a Vision Transformer (ViT) encoder with a 0.6 masking ratio during pre-training, and full images/patches during fine-tuning.
**Output**: Class probabilities for classification, pixel-wise segmentation masks for segmentation, and bounding boxes with class scores for object detection.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(predictions, gold):
acc = (predictions == gold).mean() * 100
ious = intersection_over_union(predictions, gold)
miou = ious.mean() * 100
ap_scores = compute_ap(predictions, gold, iou_thresh=0.5)
map50 = ap_scores.mean() * 100
return {'top-1 accuracy': acc, 'mIoU': miou, 'box mAP@0.5': map50}
```
## Common pitfalls
- Re-dividing datasets instead of strictly following the official train/val/test splits provided by the dataset creators.
- Using inconsistent fine-tuning protocols; the paper mandates a unified fine-tuning approach across all baselines for fair comparison.
- Ignoring high variance in contrastive learning baselines on low-class datasets, which requires multiple runs or careful standard deviation reporting.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Tab. 1 reports the top-1 accuracy of different methods on the two classification datasets. ... We report box mAP calculated at IoU threshold 0.5 on NuCLS [32].
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{luo2022selfdistillation,
title={Self-distillation Augmented Masked Autoencoders for Histopathological Image Classification},
author={Luo et al. (2022)},
year={2022},
note={arXiv:2203.16983}
}
```
- arXiv: 2203.16983
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!