Evaluates the ability of lightweight deep learning models to predict fine-grained class proportions (e.g., vegetation density, population) from satellite image chips. The protocol measures how well models trained on coarse administrative-level label proportions can recover fine-grained spatial distributions, using both proportion regression and pixel-level segmentation accuracy. Use when the user wants to benchmark on esaworldcover, humanpop, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports MAE.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill satellite-llp-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Satellite Llp Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-satellite-llp-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: satellite-llp-eval
description: Evaluates the ability of lightweight deep learning models to predict fine-grained class proportions (e.g., vegetation density, population) from satellite image chips. The protocol measures how well models trained on coarse administrative-level label proportions can recover fine-grained spatial distributions, using both proportion regression and pixel-level segmentation accuracy. Use when the user wants to benchmark on esaworldcover, humanpop, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports MAE.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2306.12461
bibtex_key: ramospollan2023onorbit
confidence: high
---
# satellite-llp-eval
> On-orbit model training for satellite imagery with label proportions — Ramos-Pollán et al. (2023) (arXiv:2306.12461, 2023)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the ability of lightweight deep learning models to predict fine-grained class proportions (e.g., vegetation density, population) from satellite image chips. The protocol measures how well models trained on coarse administrative-level label proportions can recover fine-grained spatial distributions, using both proportion regression and pixel-level segmentation accuracy.
## Datasets
- **esaworldcover** — total ?; splits: test (-1); repo https://github.com/rramosp/llpeo
- **humanpop** — total ?; splits: test (-1); repo https://github.com/rramosp/llpeo
## Metrics
- `MAE` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Mean Absolute Error computed on the predicted label proportions per chip compared to the ground truth label proportions derived from pixel-level labels.
- `F1` — range: [0, 1]
- Standard F1 score computed from the pixel-level segmentation predictions against ground truth segmentation maps.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Satellite image chips (geospatial raster data).
**Output**: Pixel-level segmentation maps (class predictions per pixel).
## Scoring recipe
```python
for each chip:
gt_props = count_pixels_by_class(gt_map) / total_pixels
pred_props = count_pixels_by_class(pred_map) / total_pixels
mae = mean(abs(pred_props - gt_props))
f1 = compute_f1_score(pred_map, gt_map)
return mae, f1
```
## Common pitfalls
- Models are trained using only coarse administrative-level label proportions, but evaluated on fine-grained chip-level proportions.
- Simpler models with fewer parameters consistently outperform larger segmentation models on this task, contrary to typical deep learning expectations.
- Evaluation combines both proportion regression (MAE) and pixel segmentation (F1), which may not always correlate.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Given the pixel level labels for each chip we compute the label proportions and compare both the segmentation model output (F1) and its proportions (MAE).
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{ramospollan2023onorbit,
title={On-orbit model training for satellite imagery with label proportions},
author={Ramos-Pollán et al. (2023)},
year={2023},
note={arXiv:2306.12461}
}
```
- arXiv: 2306.12461
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!